Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Site Rationale"
(→Ugly?: new section) |
(→Clarify Idea: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm trying to tidy and clarify the Wikispooks: namespace pages. I find all the bold strewn around this page distracting and ugly, and suggests that scanning rather than careful reading is in order. Is this just me? I've added a section about emphasis in the "Style Guide", suggesting that bold should be used sparingly. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (GMT) | I'm trying to tidy and clarify the Wikispooks: namespace pages. I find all the bold strewn around this page distracting and ugly, and suggests that scanning rather than careful reading is in order. Is this just me? I've added a section about emphasis in the "Style Guide", suggesting that bold should be used sparingly. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Clarify Idea == | ||
+ | |||
+ | How about shifting the full "All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote to the top? This might prove a more thought provoking starter than "The WikiSpooks site rationale rests on a view of the world which might best (if simplistically) be described as "Quasi-Libertarian Establishment-Sceptic" - which seems rather unclear to me. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:35, 25 November 2013 (GMT) |
Revision as of 18:35, 25 November 2013
Ugly?
I'm trying to tidy and clarify the Wikispooks: namespace pages. I find all the bold strewn around this page distracting and ugly, and suggests that scanning rather than careful reading is in order. Is this just me? I've added a section about emphasis in the "Style Guide", suggesting that bold should be used sparingly. Robin (talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (GMT)
Clarify Idea
How about shifting the full "All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote to the top? This might prove a more thought provoking starter than "The WikiSpooks site rationale rests on a view of the world which might best (if simplistically) be described as "Quasi-Libertarian Establishment-Sceptic" - which seems rather unclear to me. Robin (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2013 (GMT)