Difference between revisions of "Template:Priority"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Evidence of bias, censorship, missing information, distortion or obscurity is particularly welcome.
(link to Priority Pages category) |
(revise text) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:Banner Templates]] | <noinclude>[[Category:Banner Templates]] | ||
− | This template is for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul | + | This template is for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul. Such pages are often newly created or copied from [[Wikipedia]] or elsewhere and in skeleton format only. Pages which use this template are automatically put in [[:Category:Priority Pages]].</noinclude> |
<includeonly>[[Category:Priority Pages]]</includeonly> | <includeonly>[[Category:Priority Pages]]</includeonly> | ||
<div style="border:2px solid #ff0033; background-color:#faecc8; padding:0.4em 0.5em; margin:auto; width:86%; text-align:center;"> | <div style="border:2px solid #ff0033; background-color:#faecc8; padding:0.4em 0.5em; margin:auto; width:86%; text-align:center;"> | ||
[[File:!small.png|left]] | [[File:!small.png|left]] | ||
− | '''This is a priority page''' with | + | '''This is a priority page''' with connections to [[:Category:Deep Politics Theory |deep politics]], rendering the {{on}} particularly suspect. |
+ | <br/>Evidence of [[:Category:Wikipedia-bias |bias]], [[:Category:Wikipedia-censored|censorship]], [[:category:Wikipedia-gaps|missing information]], [[:category:Wikipedia-twisted|distortion]] or [[:Category:Wikipedia-unclear |obscurity]] is particularly welcome.</div> |
Revision as of 08:59, 30 October 2013
This template is for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul. Such pages are often newly created or copied from Wikipedia or elsewhere and in skeleton format only. Pages which use this template are automatically put in Category:Priority Pages.
This is a priority page with connections to deep politics, rendering the official narrative particularly suspect.
Evidence of bias, censorship, missing information, distortion or obscurity is particularly welcome.