Difference between revisions of "Human resource"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Gender) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|constitutes=polarising perspective | |constitutes=polarising perspective | ||
|so_called=1 | |so_called=1 | ||
| + | |abbreviation=HR | ||
|interests= | |interests= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | The phrase '''"human resource"''' is used to refer to employees. | + | The phrase '''"human resource"''' is used to refer to employees, real or prospective. |
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
[[German]] (Prussian)?{{cn}} | [[German]] (Prussian)?{{cn}} | ||
| + | "Staff management" has been replaced by "HR management]]. | ||
==Usage== | ==Usage== | ||
Revision as of 09:16, 30 August 2019
 "Human resource"  (polarising perspective)   | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Abbreviation | HR |
The phrase "human resource" is used to refer to employees, real or prospective.
Contents
Origins
German (Prussian)?[citation needed] "Staff management" has been replaced by "HR management]].
Usage
John Taylor Gatto was very critical of the phrase "human resources".
Gender
Ivan Illich wrote in Gender that an important step in establishing capitalism is the erasure of local ideas about the distinct activities for males and females, their homogenisation into a group term such as "human" (or "worker").
Connotations
Whereas "worker" refers unambiguously to a person, the phase "resource" creates different frames, which propitiate exploitation.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
