Difference between revisions of "Human resource"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_resources |image=Human resource.jpg |constitutes=polarising perspective |so_called=1 |interests= }} The phrase '''"hum...")
 
(Illich's thoughts)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
==Origins==
 
==Origins==
?
+
[[German]] (Prussian)?{{cn}}
 +
 
 +
==Usage==
 +
[[John Taylor Gatto]] was very critical of the phrase "human resources".
 +
 
 +
==Gender==
 +
[[Ivan Illich]] wrote in ''[[Gender (book)|Gender]] that an important step in establishing [[capitalism]] is the erasure of local ideas about the distinct activities for males and females, their homogenisation into a group term such as "human" (or "worker").
  
 
==Connotations==
 
==Connotations==
Line 17: Line 23:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
{{Stub}}
 

Revision as of 09:12, 30 August 2019

Concept.png "Human resource" 
(polarising perspective)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Human resource.jpg

The phrase "human resource" is used to refer to employees.

Origins

German (Prussian)?[citation needed]

Usage

John Taylor Gatto was very critical of the phrase "human resources".

Gender

Ivan Illich wrote in Gender that an important step in establishing capitalism is the erasure of local ideas about the distinct activities for males and females, their homogenisation into a group term such as "human" (or "worker").

Connotations

Whereas "worker" refers unambiguously to a person, the phase "resource" creates different frames, which propitiate exploitation.


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References