Difference between revisions of "User talk:Patrick Haseldine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Look at WikiSpooks:System Maintenance) |
(→Welcome to Wikispooks!: thanks) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:You've been putting in some interesting edits recently. This is to remind you to look at [[WikiSpooks:System Maintenance]] due to a security upgrade. [[User:Robin|Robin]] 02:11, 16 April 2013 (IST) | :You've been putting in some interesting edits recently. This is to remind you to look at [[WikiSpooks:System Maintenance]] due to a security upgrade. [[User:Robin|Robin]] 02:11, 16 April 2013 (IST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::A very useful reminder, [[User:Robin|Robin]], thanks! [[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 09:53, 16 April 2013 (IST) |
Revision as of 08:53, 16 April 2013
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came.
You will probably want to read the help pages.
The page at WikiSpooks:Getting Started should help you get started. Peter P 10:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Peter, I can see there is quite a lot of work in prospect! Patrick Haseldine 11:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- I've just finished reading through your entire user and article pages. There is lot to digest and it is welcome here. I've added the article page to the 'Whistleblowers' category. I guess you've discovered that, when you take on the State over a matter deemed 'sensitive' by the guardians of its dirty little secrets, you cannot win - period. Having clearly followed the dictates of concience at the expense of career you have both my admiration and support. FWIW, Wikispooks is my way of dealing with the State's systematic betrayal of the loyalty which it demands (and ultimately enforces - or else) from its citizens. It's a wicked old world we inhabit, but after early retirement and 10 years intense study, it is crystal clear to me that the British State is right up there with most Machiavellian - not to say Orwellian - of them all. It was a painful experience to have to admit to myself that my country was NOT on the side of the goodies and - not excluding 2 x world wars - never had been. --Peter P 13:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- As it happens, last week's episode of my radio show was on whistleblowers/the surveillance state in USA, which notes that Jane Turner is the one that got away - the exception to the general rule that Peter suggests. But if you can keep your integrity, whatever TPTB do, as far as I'm concerned, you win! Hats off to you, Patrick - and I see you as definitely the most authoritative person to edit your biography, by the way, as long as you are the real Patrick Haseldine:) As Peter says, Wikipedia is in practice not as unbiased and impartial as it claims, so comparing the Wikipedia and Wikispooks articles might prove an interesting test case. I think wiki etiquette usually grants you exclusive editing over your user page, but I'll take the liberty of tweaking the presentation so you can see how to format stuff for this wiki. Feel free to 'undo' any changes, it's your user page. Robin 14:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks both! I hope to get editing in earnest in the next day or so. Patrick Haseldine 18:54, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- You've been putting in some interesting edits recently. This is to remind you to look at WikiSpooks:System Maintenance due to a security upgrade. Robin 02:11, 16 April 2013 (IST)
- A very useful reminder, Robin, thanks! Patrick Haseldine 09:53, 16 April 2013 (IST)