Deep politics

This important article which needs work, as it is almost as unclear as the Wikipedia article from which it was copied.

Origins

Deep politics is a phrase coined by researcher and academic Peter Dale Scott to describe goings on that are so at odds with the public stories about what is happening that they are collectively ignored. If what is generally referred to as 'politics' is the 10% of an iceberg that is visible above the water, Deep Politics is the 90% which underlies it. Scott explains:

“My notion of deep politics... posits that in every culture and society there are facts which tend to be suppressed collectively, because of the social and psychological costs of not doing so. Like all other observers, I too have involuntarily suppressed facts and even memories about the drug traffic that were too provocative to be retained with equanimity.^[1]”

Scott has spent an enormous amount of time researching political processes that are never reported by newspapers and television. In particular his extensive research into the global drugs trade was an important background for his development of this term. Superficial stories, for example when a large drugs seizure is made, never give the background or seek to examine the systemic pressures whcih define the global drug trade. Although the incidents which break the media silence are undoubtedly connected (and a few independent commentators do actively try to make such connections) commercially-controlled media never make them and most members of the general public can be persuaded to overlook or acquiesce to the fact that they are being lied to by ommission.

Parapolitics

Scott’s defined "parapolitics" as follows:

1. a system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.
2. generally, covert politics, the conduct of public affairs not by rational debate and responsible decision-making but by indirection, collusion, and deceit…
3. the political exploitation of irresponsible agencies or parastructures, such as intelligence agencies… Ex.
   1. ‘The Nixon doctrine, viewed in retrospect, represented the application of parapolitics on a hitherto unprecedented scale.’
   2. ‘Democracy and parapolitics, even in foreign affairs, are ultimately incompatible.’ ^[2]

Although valuable, Scott ultimately found the label of parapolitics too limiting:

“…the investigation of parapolitics, which I defined (with the CIA in mind) as a ‘system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.’ . . . I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But parapolitics as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional . . . it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture’s rational surface. Thus I now refer to parapolitics as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged.” ^[3]

David MacGregor is another academic who applies the ideas of parapolitics and deep politics to his own research. Here are some of his observations:

“Deep politics is a revision of Scott’s original concept of parapolitics first developed in The War Conspiracy. It responds to criticism that political conspiracies, like the murder of Kennedy, are too difficult to arrange and keep hidden… ^[4]

“Scott came to see parapolitics as “too narrowly conscious and intentional to describe the deeper irrational movements which culminated collectively in the murder of the President.” In contrast deep political analysis presupposes “an open system with divergent power centers and goals” The collapse of the First Italian Republic in the mid-1990s, involving large-scale criminal influence in government, offers a telling example. It originated as an American parapolitical operation to suborn the threat of communism which parachuted prominent U.S. Mafia hoods into power in post-war Italy “By the 1980s this . . . strategem had helped spawn a deep political system of corruption exceeding Tammany’s, and (as we know from the Andreotti trial of 1995) beyond the ability of anyone to call it off”. Another example… is the CIA-financed jihad against the Russian occupiers in Afghanistan that flooded Europe with opium and helped create Osama bin Laden, a modern version of the Old Man of the Mountains, who’s 11th Century followers – the Assassins – “sacrificed for him in order to perpetuate his crimes” ^[5]

See Also

• Democratic State v Deep State by Ola Tunander A most comprehensive, lucid and persuasive description of the "Deep State" phenomenon in Western Democracies.
• The use of terrorism to construct world order by Ola Tunander.
• Machiavellian State Terror A paper by Professor David MacGregor focussing on the London Bombings of July 2005
• Understanding 911 and 911 Wars A paper by Professor John McMurtry focusing on the events of 9-11 in the USA and their aftermath
• Collection of Radio Shows on Deep Politics

Notes

1. ^  The Global Drug Meta-Group: Drugs, Managed Violence, and the Russian 9/11, Peter Dale Scott, 10/29/05, http://lobster-magazine.co.uk/articles/global-drug.htm
2. ^  The War Conspiracy, Bobbs Merrill, 1972, p.173, (chapter epigraph)
3. ^  Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California, 1996, pp.6-7
4. ^  The Deep Politics of September 11: Political Economy of Concrete Evil, a chapter within: Research in Political Economy Vol.20, Elsevier, 2002.
5. ^  (Ibid.)

External links

• Deep politics discussion forum and video channel
• Gary Webb's "Dark Alliance"
• VIDEO: "Coverup: Behind the Iran Contra Affair", A 20 minute video production from 1988, includes interview segments with Scott.
• VIDEO: "JFK & 9/11 - Insights Gained From Studying Both", a talk by Peter Dale Scott at the COPA regional meeting in Dallas, Texas at the Lawrence Hotel, November 18, 2006
• VIDEO: "Richard Cheney, Continuity of Government, and 9/11", a talk by Peter Dale Scott at the 9/11 Accountability Conference in Arizona, February 25, 2007