Difference between revisions of "Zdeněk Bažant"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(hc)
(WP citation)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
His motivations for this are unclear, though he has received various honorary doctorates and sundry academic titles. In 2015, for example, he was elected a foreign [[Fellow of the Royal Society]].
 
His motivations for this are unclear, though he has received various honorary doctorates and sundry academic titles. In 2015, for example, he was elected a foreign [[Fellow of the Royal Society]].
 +
 +
==Citation==
 +
Citing a single paper by Zdeněk Bažant, [[Wikipedia]] claimed as of January 2018 in its page entitled "List of conspiracy theories" about [[9-11]] that "the most popular theory is that the attacks were in fact controlled demolitions, a theory which has been rejected by the engineering profession" - making no mention of the group [[AE911]], which has thousands of architects and engineers as members, but which agrees that the 9/11 attacks were not as portrayed by the US government.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_conspiracy_theories&oldid=818069902</ref>
 +
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 21:07, 7 January 2018

Person.png Zdeněk Bažant   WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(academic)
Zdeněk Bažant.jpg
Born1937-12-10
Interests9-11/WTC Controlled demolition

Zdeněk Bažant has been called the "main defender" of the official narrative of the collapse of the World Trade Center, having published 4 papers about the collapses.[1]

His motivations for this are unclear, though he has received various honorary doctorates and sundry academic titles. In 2015, for example, he was elected a foreign Fellow of the Royal Society.

Citation

Citing a single paper by Zdeněk Bažant, Wikipedia claimed as of January 2018 in its page entitled "List of conspiracy theories" about 9-11 that "the most popular theory is that the attacks were in fact controlled demolitions, a theory which has been rejected by the engineering profession" - making no mention of the group AE911, which has thousands of architects and engineers as members, but which agrees that the 9/11 attacks were not as portrayed by the US government.[2]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References