Difference between revisions of "AE911 Truth"
(desc) |
(criticism) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
In 2016, an AE911Truth affiliated resolution was sponsored by 97 members of AIA (American Institute of Architects), that is 11% of the delegates’ votes, losing 529 to 4,176. The 11% tally was nearly a threefold increase over the 4% in 2015.<ref>http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=5b1f29d3c9&e=[UNIQID]</ref> | In 2016, an AE911Truth affiliated resolution was sponsored by 97 members of AIA (American Institute of Architects), that is 11% of the delegates’ votes, losing 529 to 4,176. The 11% tally was nearly a threefold increase over the 4% in 2015.<ref>http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=5b1f29d3c9&e=[UNIQID]</ref> | ||
| + | ==Criticism== | ||
| + | The group is reportedly plagued by agent provocateurs who are "propelled to positions of influence"<ref>http://healthwyze.org/tidbits/590-the-shaky-moral-foundation-that-ae911truth-is-built-upon</ref> and has also failed to make good use of volunteers.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4p80h1/my_experience_as_a_volunteer_with_ae911_truth/</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 26 October 2016
 AE911 Truth  (9-11/Truth movement)     | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Founder |  Richard Gage |
| Type | Political advocacy |
| A high profile 9/11 truth group, including over 2300 qualified architects and engineers | |
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is probably the best known 9/11 truth group. It has over 2300 qualified architects and engineers as members.
Contents
Origins
Architect Richard Gage randomly heard theologian David Ray Griffin speaking about the collapse of the World Trade Center, and decided to investigate. This lead to the formation of what is , Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911 Truth).
AIA Activism
In 2016, an AE911Truth affiliated resolution was sponsored by 97 members of AIA (American Institute of Architects), that is 11% of the delegates’ votes, losing 529 to 4,176. The 11% tally was nearly a threefold increase over the 4% in 2015.[1]
Criticism
The group is reportedly plagued by agent provocateurs who are "propelled to positions of influence"[2] and has also failed to make good use of volunteers.[3]
