Difference between revisions of "Shyam Sunder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(image) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{person | {{person | ||
|WP= | |WP= | ||
| + | |image=Shyam Sunder.jpg | ||
|constitutes=academic | |constitutes=academic | ||
|interests=Conspiracy Theorists | |interests=Conspiracy Theorists | ||
| + | |historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shyam_sunder | ||
| + | |description=Lead 'investigator' into the collapse of WTC7. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | ==Official narrative== | |
| + | Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Revision as of 23:54, 8 July 2016
 Shyam Sunder  (academic) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interests | Conspiracy Theorists |
Lead 'investigator' into the collapse of WTC7. | |
Official narrative
Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."[1]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf | letter | 20 July 2009 | Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth | A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
