Document:Putin: Letter to European Leaders

Full text of the Letter sent by Russian President Vladimir Putin to European Leaders on 9 April 2014, with commentary.

 letter  by Vladimir Putin dated 2014/04/10

---

Subjects: Ukraine coup 2014, The Great Game
Source: Kremlin Website

What is Putin really saying to the EU? - "Negotiate or else..."

Credit to Vinyard of the Saker for the following commentary on Putin's letter

.... Russia is responding to the the imminent attack by the neo-Nazis in the Eastern Ukraine and to the PACE decision to basically slap Russia in the face. What Putin is doing is introducing the first of several weapons Russia has in reserve: energy and money. He basically tells the West "you either sit down, eat your stupid PACE resolution, and come negotiate with us, or you will be in a great deal of pain very soon". Under the pretext of negotiating for gas, he is forcing Europe to negotiate for the future of the Ukrainian economy and that, in turn, means negotiating for the political future of the Europe. Brought down to is core message Putin just told the EU: agree to the Federalization of Ukraine or lose 30% of your energy supplies. The corollary message is: there is a price to pay for being the USA's bitch.

The EU needs to be very careful now, as Russia is clearly poised to respond to a major crisis: Putin has told his government that all supplies from the Ukraine are likely to stop. This there are two levels to this message: one minor, in which he tells the Russian MIC that it has to prepare to produce indigenously what they got for cheap in the past from the Ukraine. Everybody noticed that, but that is not the important part. The important part is that he basically told the Ukrainians "expect a total severance of all contracts and agreements between what is left of your industry and us". Basically, this might as well be a death sentence for the last and only sector of the Ukrainian economy which was profitable. Putin will observe what happens over the next couple of days (crackdown or not) and he will observe what comes from the West (negotiations or not). But unless the freaks in Kiev and the clowns in the West very rapidly take him seriously and finally come to the negotiating table, Putin will shut down what is left of the Ukrainian economy. This will trigger an immediate panic of the rating agencies and markets and the Ukraine will default.

At this point I do expect a very forceful reaction of western bankers and economists who will, I am quite sure, understand the message very well, and they will probably put a great deal of pressure on the political leaders in the EU and even the USA which can think itself safe from a crisis in Europe, but if you look at how heavily the USA is invested in Europe, you will see that this is not so. There is also a very real risk of a domino effect on the rest of the EU if any of its weakest members - the so called PIGS - hits the wall. France too is essentially bankrupt, so the risk from a Russian action on gas is really serious for all the western economies.

Make no mistake: triggering an economic crisis in Europe is not at all in Russia's best interest. In fact, this would be very bad for Russia, but if that is what it takes you can count on the Russians doing it. Right now, the West's position on the Ukraine is simple: no negotiations whatsoever and total support for the Nazis in power. That is just not something Russia can accept short of committing national suicide. By taking this maximalist and, frankly, insane stance the West has pushed the proverbial "Russian bear" into a corner and the only option this bear now sees is to fight his way out with his claws and fangs. I can't think of a dumber policy to have towards any free animal, never mind a bear.

Wikispooks Comment

---

All the signs are that the the US has decided the time has come to bring the 20-years-building and inevitable confrontation with a recalcitrant Russia to a head. Western commercially-controlled media analysis of the manufactured crisis in Ukraine remains uniformly bellicose towards Russia, in spite of numerous Russian attempts to get both the US and EU to engage in serious consultations about how best to cooperate in preventing Ukraine from descending into chaos, both before and since the late February Coup. Almost all Western politician are manifesting a purblind determination to ignore Russia's legitimate concerns about Ukraine and to blame Russia for everything. In other words, they are ignorant, infantile fools; On the other hand, the deep state interests orchestrating their ignorance, lead by the Anglo-US fraternities, are most certainly not, and the disciplined control they have so far exercised almost unchallenged is frightening in its implications for what is to come. Europe is being maneuvered into precisely the same geo-political position it occupied in both of the 20th century world wars.

In Orwellian terms it is Oceania -v- Eurasia. For insight into the century-old geo-political imperatives at work, see the documents listed on the Wikispooks The Great Game page.

It is to be hoped that this pending second historical repeat will follow Marx's withering 'Bonapartism' and repeat as farce.  ; but the signs are not good: all Russian overtures to date (11 April 2014) have been rebuffed with pompous, insulting arrogance and we are now faced with a grave situation indeed; because it is clear, both from Putin's post-Crimea referendum speech and this letter, that Russia is not bluffing.

Vladimir Putin - the expression says it all.

On a lighter note: priceless stuff from Putin about the US reaction to his PRIVATE letter accusing him of "using energy as a tool of coercion against Ukraine.”:

This is somewhat curious. I say this first of all because it is not the proper thing to read others’ letters. I did not write to Washington after all, but to our gas customers in Europe. We are already used to the fact that our American friends eavesdrop on everyone, but it is really not the done thing to sneak a look at others’ correspondence.....This will take more than handing out pies at the Maidan. That’s all not enough to keep the Ukrainian economy from slipping into total chaos. Our American partners have responded so negatively to our proposal, which is very strange to see.

★ Start a Discussion about this document

---

Ukraine’s economy in the past several months has been plummeting. Its industrial and construction sectors have also been declining sharply. Its budget deficit is mounting. The condition of its currency system is becoming more and more deplorable. The negative trade balance is accompanied by the flight of capital from the country. Ukraine’s economy is steadfastly heading towards a default, a halt in production and skyrocketing unemployment.

One-third of gas consumed in EU comes from Russia. Infographics ITAR-TASS

Russia and the EU member states are Ukraine’s major trading partners. Proceeding from this, at the Russia-EU Summit at the end of January, we came to an agreement with our European partners to hold consultations on the subject of developing Ukraine’s economy, bearing in mind the interests of Ukraine and our countries while forming integration alliances with Ukraine’s participation. However, all attempts on Russia’s part to begin real consultations failed to produce any results.

Instead of consultations, we hear appeals to lower contractual prices on Russian natural gas – prices which are allegedly of a “political” nature. One gets the impression that the European partners want to unilaterally blame Russia for the consequences of Ukraine’s economic crisis.

Right from day one of Ukraine’s existence as an independent state, Russia has supported the stability of the Ukrainian economy by supplying it with natural gas at cut-rate prices. In January 2009, with the participation of the then-premier Yulia Tymoshenko, a purchase-and-sale contract on supplying natural gas for the period of 2009-2019 was signed. The contract regulated questions concerning the delivery of and payment for the product, and it also provided guarantees for its uninterrupted transit through the territory of Ukraine. What is more, Russia has been fulfilling the contract according to the letter and spirit of the document. Incidentally, Ukrainian Minister of Fuel and Energy at that time was Yuriy Prodan, who today holds a similar post in Kiev’s government.

The total volume of natural gas delivered to Ukraine, as stipulated in the contract during the period of 2009-2014 (first quarter), stands at 147.2 billion cubic meters. Here, I would like to emphasize that the price formula that had been set down in the contract had NOT been altered since that moment. And Ukraine, right up till August 2013, made regular payments for the natural gas in accordance with that formula.

However, the fact that after signing that contract, Russia granted Ukraine a whole string of unprecedented privileges and discounts on the price of natural gas, is quite another matter. This applies to the discount stemming from the 2010 Kharkiv Agreement, which was provided as advance payment for the future lease payments for the presence of the (Russian) Black Sea Fleet after 2017. This also refers to discounts on the prices for natural gas purchased by Ukraine’s chemical companies. This also concerns the discount granted in December 2013 for the duration of three months due to the critical state of Ukraine’s economy. Beginning with 2009, the total sum of these discounts stands at 17 billion US dollars. To this, we should add another 18.4 billion US dollars incurred by the Ukrainian side as a minimal take-or-pay fine.

In this manner, during the past four years, Russia has been subsidizing Ukraine’s economy by offering slashed natural gas prices worth 35.4 billion US dollars. In addition, in December 2013, Russia granted Ukraine a loan of 3 billion US dollars. These very significant sums were directed towards maintaining the stability and creditability of the Ukrainian economy and preservation of jobs. No other country provided such support except Russia.

Ukraine’s stored natural gas enough for one month - minister

What about the European partners? Instead of offering Ukraine real support, there is talk about a declaration of intent. There are only promises that are not backed by any real actions. The European Union is using Ukraine’s economy as a source of raw foodstuffs, metal and mineral resources, and at the same time, as a market for selling its highly-processed ready-made commodities (machine engineering and chemicals), thereby creating a deficit in Ukraine’s trade balance amounting to more than 10 billion US dollars. This comes to almost two-thirds of Ukraine’s overall deficit for 2013.

To a large extent, the crisis in Ukraine’s economy has been precipitated by the unbalanced trade with the EU member states, and this, in turn has had a sharply negative impact on Ukraine’s fulfillment of its contractual obligations to pay for deliveries of natural gas supplied by Russia. Gazprom neither has intentions except for those stipulated in the 2009 contract nor plans to set any additional conditions. This also concerns the contractual price for natural gas, which is calculated in strict accordance with the agreed formula. However, Russia cannot and should not unilaterally bear the burden of supporting Ukraine’s economy by way of providing discounts and forgiving debts, and in fact, using these subsidies to cover Ukraine’s deficit in its trade with the EU member states.

Putin says situation around Russia-Ukraine energy cooperation complicated

The debt of NAK Naftogaz Ukraine for delivered gas has been growing monthly this year. In November-December 2013 this debt stood at 1.451,5 billion US dollars; in February 2014 it increased by a further 260.3 million and in March by another 526.1 million US dollars. Here I would like to draw your attention to the fact that in March there was still a discount price applied, i.e., 268.5 US dollars per 1,000 cubic meters of gas. And even at that price, Ukraine did not pay a single dollar.

In such conditions, in accordance with Articles 5.15, 5.8 and 5.3 of the contract, Gazprom is compelled to switch over to advance payment for gas delivery, and in the event of further violation of the conditions of payment, will completely or partially cease gas deliveries. In other words, only the volume of natural gas will be delivered to Ukraine as was paid for one month in advance of delivery.

Undoubtedly, this is an extreme measure. We fully realize that this increases the risk of siphoning off natural gas passing through Ukraine’s territory and heading to European consumers. We also realize that this may make it difficult for Ukraine to accumulate sufficient gas reserves for use in the autumn and winter period. In order to guarantee uninterrupted transit, it will be necessary, in the nearest future, to supply 11.5 billion cubic meters of gas that will be pumped into Ukraine’s underground storage facilities, and this will require a payment of about 5 billion US dollars.

However, the fact that our European partners have unilaterally withdrawn from the concerted efforts to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, and even from holding consultations with the Russian side, leaves Russia no alternative.

Missile cruiser Moskva of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Ukraine's debt to Russia stands at $10 billion after severing Black Sea Fleet agreements

There can be only one way out of the situation that has developed. We believe it is vital to hold, without delay, consultations at the level of ministers of economics, finances and energy in order to work out concerted actions to stabilize Ukraine’s economy and to ensure delivery and transit of Russian natural gas in accordance with the terms and conditions set down in the contract. We must lose no time in beginning to coordinate concrete steps. It is towards this end that we appeal to our European partners.

It goes without saying that Russia is prepared to participate in the effort to stabilize and restore Ukraine’s economy. However, not in a unilateral way, but on equal conditions with our European partners. It is also essential to take into account the actual investments, contributions and expenditures that Russia has shouldered by itself alone for such a long time in supporting Ukraine. As we see it, only such an approach would be fair and balanced, and only such an approach can lead to success.