Difference between revisions of "Talk:9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (reply)
(Lockerbie link to 9-11)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Lockerbie link to 9-11==
 +
[[9/11]] is a topic which until very recently I have studiously avoided. On 30 June 2015, I finally uncovered the [https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Scottish_Mirror.jpg ''Scottish Mirror'' article of 11 September 2001] that I remembered reading with incredulity fourteen long years ago. A friend had sent me the link but it was lost somehow over the years. Googling the press on that date only turned up secondary sources or links to 9/11 articles. Then Eureka! On 30 June 2015, I stumbled across the ''BBC News'' report of 11 September 2001 [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/1536773.stm "Key Lockerbie 'evidence' not used"] and there was the long lost ''Scottish Mirror'' front page. Straightaway I wrote a [[Bernard Hogan-Howe#Lockerbie crime scene at Heathrow|second letter to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe]] referring to the Heathrow break-in and the ''Scottish Mirror'' revelations. I also mounted email, [https://www.facebook.com/groups/118951448146734/910879175620620 ''Facebook''] and [https://twitter.com/BerntCarlsson/status/616248034041692160 ''Twitter''] campaigns that have all been well received.
 +
 +
On 2 July 2015, my first edit to the [[9/11]] page which introduced this missing Lockerbie link was deleted and relegated to one of the mere [[9-11/Coincidences‎]]. My second edit on 3 July, again deleted, introduced the idea of [[George H W Bush]] and the [[CIA]]'s complicity in both attacks:
 +
:[[Pan Am Flight 103|Lockerbie]] led by South Africa's [[Civil Cooperation Bureau]]; and,
 +
:[[9-11/Israel_did_it|9/11]] led by [[Mossad]].
 +
 +
I would urge [[User:Robin|Robin]] to reconsider, unprotect the [[9/11]] page and [https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=9-11&oldid=63629 link it as I have suggested] to its [[terrorist]] predecessor [[Pan Am Flight 103]].--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 19:19, 3 July 2015 (IST)
 +
 
== SMWDocs Issue? ==
 
== SMWDocs Issue? ==
  
 
I wonder why the '''Related Documents''' section of this page doesn't reflect the [[Property:Display docType]] of the documents listed... [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:40, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
 
I wonder why the '''Related Documents''' section of this page doesn't reflect the [[Property:Display docType]] of the documents listed... [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:40, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
 
:I've noticed that before and often. If you refresh one of the listed pages, then return here and refresh it, it will display the correct type. I originally thought it was a job queue issue, but I don't think it is now since the incorrect displays have survived several hard cache clears and data rebuilds. I've just confirmed the behaviour again on the top item it the list --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 16:08, 10 February 2014 (GMT)
 
:I've noticed that before and often. If you refresh one of the listed pages, then return here and refresh it, it will display the correct type. I originally thought it was a job queue issue, but I don't think it is now since the incorrect displays have survived several hard cache clears and data rebuilds. I've just confirmed the behaviour again on the top item it the list --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 16:08, 10 February 2014 (GMT)

Revision as of 18:19, 3 July 2015

Lockerbie link to 9-11

9/11 is a topic which until very recently I have studiously avoided. On 30 June 2015, I finally uncovered the Scottish Mirror article of 11 September 2001 that I remembered reading with incredulity fourteen long years ago. A friend had sent me the link but it was lost somehow over the years. Googling the press on that date only turned up secondary sources or links to 9/11 articles. Then Eureka! On 30 June 2015, I stumbled across the BBC News report of 11 September 2001 "Key Lockerbie 'evidence' not used" and there was the long lost Scottish Mirror front page. Straightaway I wrote a second letter to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe referring to the Heathrow break-in and the Scottish Mirror revelations. I also mounted email, Facebook and Twitter campaigns that have all been well received.

On 2 July 2015, my first edit to the 9/11 page which introduced this missing Lockerbie link was deleted and relegated to one of the mere 9-11/Coincidences‎. My second edit on 3 July, again deleted, introduced the idea of George H W Bush and the CIA's complicity in both attacks:

Lockerbie led by South Africa's Civil Cooperation Bureau; and,
9/11 led by Mossad.

I would urge Robin to reconsider, unprotect the 9/11 page and link it as I have suggested to its terrorist predecessor Pan Am Flight 103.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2015 (IST)

SMWDocs Issue?

I wonder why the Related Documents section of this page doesn't reflect the Property:Display docType of the documents listed... Robin (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2014 (GMT)

I've noticed that before and often. If you refresh one of the listed pages, then return here and refresh it, it will display the correct type. I originally thought it was a job queue issue, but I don't think it is now since the incorrect displays have survived several hard cache clears and data rebuilds. I've just confirmed the behaviour again on the top item it the list --Peter P (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2014 (GMT)