Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Site Rationale"
(→Clarify Idea: new section) |
m (→Clarify Idea: reply) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
How about shifting the full "All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote to the top? This might prove a more thought provoking starter than "The WikiSpooks site rationale rests on a view of the world which might best (if simplistically) be described as "Quasi-Libertarian Establishment-Sceptic" - which seems rather unclear to me. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:35, 25 November 2013 (GMT) | How about shifting the full "All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote to the top? This might prove a more thought provoking starter than "The WikiSpooks site rationale rests on a view of the world which might best (if simplistically) be described as "Quasi-Libertarian Establishment-Sceptic" - which seems rather unclear to me. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:35, 25 November 2013 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm OK with this and bold-facing observations above. Also the 'unclear' observation - it's unclear to me too and I wrote it!!!. You're not going to offend me with any of this Robin. Your style and content-revison suggestions have invariably led to improvements in both areas, so just feel free to get stuck in. If I take particular exception to something, I'll red-edit/revert with a reason. Have to say I do like the Sheeple part of this page with its graphic though - very telling IMHO. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 19:00, 25 November 2013 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 25 November 2013
Ugly?
I'm trying to tidy and clarify the Wikispooks: namespace pages. I find all the bold strewn around this page distracting and ugly, and suggests that scanning rather than careful reading is in order. Is this just me? I've added a section about emphasis in the "Style Guide", suggesting that bold should be used sparingly. Robin (talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (GMT)
Clarify Idea
How about shifting the full "All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" quote to the top? This might prove a more thought provoking starter than "The WikiSpooks site rationale rests on a view of the world which might best (if simplistically) be described as "Quasi-Libertarian Establishment-Sceptic" - which seems rather unclear to me. Robin (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2013 (GMT)
- I'm OK with this and bold-facing observations above. Also the 'unclear' observation - it's unclear to me too and I wrote it!!!. You're not going to offend me with any of this Robin. Your style and content-revison suggestions have invariably led to improvements in both areas, so just feel free to get stuck in. If I take particular exception to something, I'll red-edit/revert with a reason. Have to say I do like the Sheeple part of this page with its graphic though - very telling IMHO. --Peter P (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2013 (GMT)
