Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Expand slightly)
m (Grammar fix)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Problems with Wikipedia ==
 
== Problems with Wikipedia ==
 
''Main article: [[WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia]]''<br/>
 
''Main article: [[WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia]]''<br/>
The core problem of Wikipedia is the problem of establishing reliability. It has decided that it depend on "''reliable secondary sources such as {{msm}}''", echoing the pattern of {{ccm}} the world over. It is therefore inevitable that at least on commercially or politically sensitive topics, Wikipedia tends to display a predictable pattern of symptoms:
+
The core problem of Wikipedia is the problem of establishing reliability. Its decision to depend on "''reliable secondary sources such as {{msm}}''", echoes the pattern of {{ccm}} the world over. It is therefore inevitable that at least on commercially or politically sensitive topics, Wikipedia tends to display a predictable pattern of symptoms:
 
{{WPProblemList}}
 
{{WPProblemList}}
  

Revision as of 10:27, 25 October 2013

Wikipedia.png

Launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, Wikipedia has an impressive 30 million or so articles in around 300 languages.

Hierarchy Of Editors

Wikipedia bills itself as "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit", and while that is true, reverting people's edits is really easy, and so is blocking users or IP addresses. Not everyone can do that. Who decides who can and who can't? Only a few hundred editors have this privilege - and it can be revoked if someone's decisions are deemed 'out of line' with the official narrative. Wikipedia is not as radically unbiased and fair as it purports to be, and increasingly reflects the agendas of those with deep pockets who have invested in shaping it to suit their commercial purposes.

Problems with Wikipedia

Main article: WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia
The core problem of Wikipedia is the problem of establishing reliability. Its decision to depend on "reliable secondary sources such as mainstream media", echoes the pattern of commercially-controlled media the world over. It is therefore inevitable that at least on commercially or politically sensitive topics, Wikipedia tends to display a predictable pattern of symptoms:

Wikipedia's
Problems
:
Wikipedia-logo-Bias.png Bias Wikipedia-logo-Censorship.png Censorship Wikipedia-logo-Gaps.png Gaps Wikipedia-logo-Spin.png Spin Wikipedia-logo-Obfuscation.png Obfuscation


See Also