Difference between revisions of "9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add image)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{9/11 rules}}
 
{{9/11 rules}}
 
+
[[file:wtc7.gif | frame | right | Did you know that [[9/11 WTC Building 7 Collapse |WTC7 collapsed spontaneously]] on 9/11, although it was not hit by a plane? Or that its collapse was announced on television ''before'' it happened?]]
  
 
Nine years after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy.  This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such ''"catastrophic and catalyzing event"'', <ref>[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf PNAC Rebuilding America's Defences. Page 51]</ref> it surely cannot continue for much longer.  
 
Nine years after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy.  This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such ''"catastrophic and catalyzing event"'', <ref>[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf PNAC Rebuilding America's Defences. Page 51]</ref> it surely cannot continue for much longer.  

Revision as of 03:03, 16 July 2011

This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA.

Template:9/11 rules

File:Wtc7.gif
Did you know that WTC7 collapsed spontaneously on 9/11, although it was not hit by a plane? Or that its collapse was announced on television before it happened?

Nine years after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy. This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such "catastrophic and catalyzing event", [1] it surely cannot continue for much longer.


Template:Add


Subsidiary 9/11 articles

See Also

References

External Links


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.