Difference between revisions of "User talk:Vinod Akula"
m (Welcome!) |
m (Text replacement - "WikiSpooks" to "Wikispooks") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Welcome to Wikispooks! == | == Welcome to Wikispooks! == | ||
| − | <big>We're glad you came. There's [[ | + | <big>We're glad you came. There's [[Wikispooks:To_Do|lots to do]].</big><br/> |
| − | The '''[[ | + | The '''[[Wikispooks:Community portal|Community portal]]''' is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go [http://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=wikispooks here]. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:38, 19 September 2016 (IST) |
| + | |||
| + | == Ziad Abdelnour == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just reinstated the word "fraudster" on Mr. Abdelnour's page, since an archived copy of the [[SEC]] website reads: | ||
| + | {{QB|"Although Abdelnour did not succeed in selling any of the fictitious securities, as a result of his '''fraud''', Abdelnour willfully violated Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act, | ||
| + | and by engaging in unregistered broker-dealer activity, he violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act."<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140110213035/http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/33-9402.pdf</ref>}} | ||
| + | I also added details about these charges, to assist our readers - who should be the motivation for any and all edits to this site. I would be obliged if you would read and reflect upon point #2 of [[Wikispooks:Registered_User_Undertakings#Registered_user_undertakings|this page]]. i.e. ''Wikispooks is not a place for people who are editing at other's behest''. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:27, 22 September 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I notice you have been removing important and well sourced information about Mr. Abdelnour, which other people quickly replaced. They are likely to keep doing this unless you explain your edits. Do you have any extra information which leads you to doubt the SEC's judgment in this case? Or do you have a personal interest? Would you care to explain why you are interested in this article? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 04:53, 18 October 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:11, 14 October 2018
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Robin (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2016 (IST)
Ziad Abdelnour
I just reinstated the word "fraudster" on Mr. Abdelnour's page, since an archived copy of the SEC website reads:
"Although Abdelnour did not succeed in selling any of the fictitious securities, as a result of his fraud, Abdelnour willfully violated Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act, and by engaging in unregistered broker-dealer activity, he violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act."[1]
I also added details about these charges, to assist our readers - who should be the motivation for any and all edits to this site. I would be obliged if you would read and reflect upon point #2 of this page. i.e. Wikispooks is not a place for people who are editing at other's behest. -- Robin (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2016 (IST)
I notice you have been removing important and well sourced information about Mr. Abdelnour, which other people quickly replaced. They are likely to keep doing this unless you explain your edits. Do you have any extra information which leads you to doubt the SEC's judgment in this case? Or do you have a personal interest? Would you care to explain why you are interested in this article? -- Robin (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2016 (IST)
