Difference between revisions of "Property talk:Has website"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(NB) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Marginal use case of this== | ==Marginal use case of this== | ||
Currently, this is mapped to foaf:website, which relates people to their homepage. This is OK for people and groups, but I think it won't do for website pages->URLs, because the relationship is more like "Has URL". Hence, it might be better to not use this in [[template:Website]], which may want a different property. I'll sleep on it. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 21:15, 6 January 2014 (GMT) | Currently, this is mapped to foaf:website, which relates people to their homepage. This is OK for people and groups, but I think it won't do for website pages->URLs, because the relationship is more like "Has URL". Hence, it might be better to not use this in [[template:Website]], which may want a different property. I'll sleep on it. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 21:15, 6 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes. I've had a quick look at the existing template code. The declaration 'Has website' in it may not produce a coding circularity but it is a semantic non-sequitur to say that a website has a website if the website it has is itself !!! --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:41, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:41, 7 January 2014
Marginal use case of this
Currently, this is mapped to foaf:website, which relates people to their homepage. This is OK for people and groups, but I think it won't do for website pages->URLs, because the relationship is more like "Has URL". Hence, it might be better to not use this in template:Website, which may want a different property. I'll sleep on it. Robin (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2014 (GMT)
