Difference between revisions of "Institute for Statecraft/Control"
(Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia= |image= |constitutes= |description=The degree of autonomy of the Integrity Initiative/Institute for Statecraft is a matter of speculation. |inte...") |
(Unstub) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|interests= | |interests= | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | '''Control of the [[Institute for Statecraft]]/[[Integrity Initiative]]''' is a moot point. The group is [[Integrity Initiative/Secrecy|very secretive]], as is typical for [[deep state]] group. Its [[Integrity Initiative/Leak|leaked]] documents, together with what is known about its public activities, provide indirect evidence of control by the [[UK Deep state]]. | |
==Headquarters== | ==Headquarters== | ||
− | The group's operational HQ is in Temple, London, in a basement | + | The group's operational HQ is in Temple, London, in a basement apparently provided rent free<ref>No records have been found which refer to the group's paying any rent.</ref> by the [[UK Ministry of Defense]]. |
=="the Sponsor"== | =="the Sponsor"== | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|source=Integrity Initiative/Leak/3#Ramping up IfS work 16 03 2018.pdf | |source=Integrity Initiative/Leak/3#Ramping up IfS work 16 03 2018.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
− |
Latest revision as of 18:41, 8 March 2020
Institute for Statecraft/Control | |
---|---|
The degree of autonomy of the Integrity Initiative/Institute for Statecraft is a matter of speculation. |
Control of the Institute for Statecraft/Integrity Initiative is a moot point. The group is very secretive, as is typical for deep state group. Its leaked documents, together with what is known about its public activities, provide indirect evidence of control by the UK Deep state.
Headquarters
The group's operational HQ is in Temple, London, in a basement apparently provided rent free[1] by the UK Ministry of Defense.
"the Sponsor"
A suggestion that the group is directly answerable to an external entity is provided by a sidebar comment from Victor Madeira. He commented on a document from the third Integrity Initiative leak:
“Comment [VM2]: Most of these aren’t even Cluster countries – can II justify spending ££ on strengthening media there? Don’t get me wrong: any help we can provide these and other colleagues is a win in my books but I’m trying to anticipate how the Sponsor may see the relevance of speakers from some of these countries.”
Victor Madeira (16 March 2018) [citation needed]
References
- ↑ No records have been found which refer to the group's paying any rent.