Difference between revisions of "Vatican Bank"
(desc) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_the_Works_of_Religion | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_the_Works_of_Religion | ||
|constitutes=bank | |constitutes=bank | ||
| − | | | + | |description="The Most Secret Bank In the World" that has used "[[sovereign immunity]]" in court. |
|image=Vatican Bank.jpg | |image=Vatican Bank.jpg | ||
|twitter= | |twitter= | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Alperin v. Vatican Bank was an unsuccessful [[class action]] suit by Holocaust survivors brought against the Vatican Bank] ("Institute for the Works of Religion" or "IOR") and the [[Franciscan|Franciscan Order]] ("Order of Friars Minor") filed in [[San Francisco]], [[California]] on November 15, 1999. The case was initially dismissed as a [[political question]] by the [[United States District Court for the Northern District of California|District Court for the Northern District of California]] in 2003, but was reinstated in part by the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]] in 2005. That ruling attracted attention as a precedent at the intersection of the [[Alien Tort Statute|Alien Tort Claims Act]] (ATCA) and the [[Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act]] (FSIA). | Alperin v. Vatican Bank was an unsuccessful [[class action]] suit by Holocaust survivors brought against the Vatican Bank] ("Institute for the Works of Religion" or "IOR") and the [[Franciscan|Franciscan Order]] ("Order of Friars Minor") filed in [[San Francisco]], [[California]] on November 15, 1999. The case was initially dismissed as a [[political question]] by the [[United States District Court for the Northern District of California|District Court for the Northern District of California]] in 2003, but was reinstated in part by the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]] in 2005. That ruling attracted attention as a precedent at the intersection of the [[Alien Tort Statute|Alien Tort Claims Act]] (ATCA) and the [[Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act]] (FSIA). | ||
| − | Part of the complaint against the IOR was dismissed in 2007 on the basis of [[sovereign immunity]], and the remainder of the claim against that defendant was dismissed on the ground that the property claim had no nexus to the United States, a decision confirmed in February 2010 by the Ninth Circuit. The case against the Franciscan Order, who by then were the sole defendants, ended in March 2011 when the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment dismissing the claim, and the case was not appealed further. No part of the claim, therefore, ever came to trial and none of the plaintiffs' allegations of fact were ever established in Court. | + | Part of the complaint against the IOR was dismissed in 2007 on the basis of "[[sovereign immunity]]", and the remainder of the claim against that defendant was dismissed on the ground that the property claim had no nexus to the United States, a decision confirmed in February 2010 by the Ninth Circuit. The case against the Franciscan Order, who by then were the sole defendants, ended in March 2011 when the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment dismissing the claim, and the case was not appealed further. No part of the claim, therefore, ever came to trial and none of the plaintiffs' allegations of fact were ever established in Court. |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:54, 18 December 2023
 Vatican Bank  (Bank)    | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Headquarters | Vatican City |
| "The Most Secret Bank In the World" that has used "sovereign immunity" in court. | |
In 2012, Forbes termed the Vatican Bank the "The Most Secret Bank In the World".[1]
Scandals
Yes.[2]
Alperin v. Vatican Bank was an unsuccessful class action suit by Holocaust survivors brought against the Vatican Bank] ("Institute for the Works of Religion" or "IOR") and the Franciscan Order ("Order of Friars Minor") filed in San Francisco, California on November 15, 1999. The case was initially dismissed as a political question by the District Court for the Northern District of California in 2003, but was reinstated in part by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2005. That ruling attracted attention as a precedent at the intersection of the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
Part of the complaint against the IOR was dismissed in 2007 on the basis of "sovereign immunity", and the remainder of the claim against that defendant was dismissed on the ground that the property claim had no nexus to the United States, a decision confirmed in February 2010 by the Ninth Circuit. The case against the Franciscan Order, who by then were the sole defendants, ended in March 2011 when the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment dismissing the claim, and the case was not appealed further. No part of the claim, therefore, ever came to trial and none of the plaintiffs' allegations of fact were ever established in Court.
