Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:Notability in Wikipedia"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "WikiSpooks" to "Wikispooks")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WpPage
 
{{WpPage
|WpPageName=Notability in Wikipedia
+
|WPBias=No
 +
|WPNewsprint=No
 +
|WpIntro=As with Wikipedia's '[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral Point of View]]' policy, its 'Notability guidelines' are problematic, particularly its de facto assumption of good faith by 'mainstream news media and major academic journals'.
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notability_in_Wikipedia
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notability_in_Wikipedia
|WpIntro=As with the Wikipedia '[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral Point of View]]' policy, its 'Notability guidelines' stand in stark contrast to the Wikispooks' approach.
+
|WPCensored=No
|WsLink1=WikiSpooks:Editorial Policy
+
|WPTwisted=No
 +
|WPGaps=No
 +
|WPUnclear=No
 +
|Stub=No
 +
|WsLink1=Wikispooks:Editorial Policy
 
|WsLink1Desc=Wikispooks editorial policy. Includes critiques of Notability of sources, bias and NPoV
 
|WsLink1Desc=Wikispooks editorial policy. Includes critiques of Notability of sources, bias and NPoV
|WsLink2=WikiSpooks:Read This First
+
|WsLink2=Wikispooks:Read This First
 
|WsLink2Desc=The most succinct statement of the Wikipedia/Wikispooks dichotomy
 
|WsLink2Desc=The most succinct statement of the Wikipedia/Wikispooks dichotomy
 +
|WpPageName=Notability in Wikipedia
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:26, 14 October 2018


WpIcon32.png Notability in Wikipedia






As with Wikipedia's 'Neutral Point of View' policy, its 'Notability guidelines' are problematic, particularly its de facto assumption of good faith by 'mainstream news media and major academic journals'.


Related Wikispooks Pages

Wikispooks:Editorial Policy Wikispooks:Editorial Policy - Wikispooks editorial policy. Includes critiques of Notability of sources, bias and NPoV
Wikispooks:Read This First Wikispooks:Read This First - The most succinct statement of the Wikipedia/Wikispooks dichotomy