Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WpPage | {{WpPage | ||
| − | | | + | |WsLink0=Conspiracy theory |
| + | |WPBias=Yes | ||
| + | |WpIntro=The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and above all unclear. It fails to note that the phrase has been [http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561 deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s] by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that [[MSM|commercially controlled media]] are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official [[9/11]] story is a ''theory'' about a ''conspiracy'', commercial media never describe it as a ''conspiracy theory''. | ||
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory | |WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory | ||
| + | |WPCensored=No | ||
| + | |WPTwisted=No | ||
| + | |WPGaps=No | ||
| + | |WPUnclear=Yes | ||
| + | |Stub=No | ||
|WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory | |WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory | ||
|WsLink1Desc=While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition. | |WsLink1Desc=While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 14: | ||
|WsLink2Desc=A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense | |WsLink2Desc=A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense | ||
|WsLink3=The Power of Unreason | |WsLink3=The Power of Unreason | ||
| − | |WsLink3Desc=Critique of an Establishment | + | |WsLink3Desc=Critique of an Establishment paper on 'Conspiracy theories' sub-titled: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism |
| − | |ExLink1=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_theory | + | |WsLink4=Document:Democratic State v Deep State |
| − | | | + | |WsLink4Desc=A seminal paper by Norwegian academic [[Ola Tunander]] |
| − | | | + | |WsLink5=Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory |
| + | |WsLink5Desc=Another seminal paper by Lance DeHaven-Smith. Subtitled "Patterns of High Crime in American Government" and originally published in the February 2010 edition of '''''American Behavioral Scientist''''' | ||
| + | |WsLink6=:Category:Conspiracy Theory | ||
| + | |WsLink6Desc=A collection of pages, documents and articles filed under the category 'Conspiracy Theory' | ||
| + | |ExLink1=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561 | ||
| + | |ExLink1Name=$100,000,000 to Crack A Lone Nut? | ||
| + | |ExLink1Desc=A radio show including Mark Crispin Miller on the [[CIA]]'s creation of 'conspiracy theory' as a pejorative | ||
| + | |ExLink2=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_theory | ||
| + | |ExLink2Name=Conspiracy theory | ||
| + | |ExLink2Desc=Conspiracy theory page on the [[Sourcewatch]] wiki | ||
| + | |ExLink3=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/212 | ||
| + | |ExLink3Name=Conspiracy Reality (Understanding the Tools Used to Perpetuate Lies) | ||
| + | |ExLink3Desc=Jamey Hecht on how the term "conspiracy theory" is used to deflect examination of the routine violence that the state uses to maintain power. | ||
| + | |WpPageName=Conspiracy theory | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 17:04, 1 October 2013
 Conspiracy theory
|
 Conspiracy theory
|
 
|
The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and above all unclear. It fails to note that the phrase has been deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that commercially controlled media are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official 9/11 story is a theory about a conspiracy, commercial media never describe it as a conspiracy theory. |
Related Wikispooks Pages
Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory - While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition. Document:Conspiracies and Conspiracism - A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense The Power of Unreason - Critique of an Establishment paper on 'Conspiracy theories' sub-titled: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism Document:Democratic State v Deep State - A seminal paper by Norwegian academic Ola Tunander Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory - Another seminal paper by Lance DeHaven-Smith. Subtitled "Patterns of High Crime in American Government" and originally published in the February 2010 edition of American Behavioral Scientist Category:Conspiracy Theory - A collection of pages, documents and articles filed under the category 'Conspiracy Theory'
External Links
- $100,000,000 to Crack A Lone Nut? - A radio show including Mark Crispin Miller on the CIA's creation of 'conspiracy theory' as a pejorative
- Conspiracy theory - Conspiracy theory page on the Sourcewatch wiki
- Conspiracy Reality (Understanding the Tools Used to Perpetuate Lies) - Jamey Hecht on how the term "conspiracy theory" is used to deflect examination of the routine violence that the state uses to maintain power.
