Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{WpPage |WpPageName=Conspiracy theory |WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory |WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory |WsLink1Des...")
 
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WpPage
 
{{WpPage
|WpPageName=Conspiracy theory
+
|WsLink0=Conspiracy theory
 +
|WPBias=Yes
 +
|WpIntro=The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and above all unclear. It fails to note that the phrase has been [http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561 deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s] by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that [[MSM|commercially controlled media]] are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official [[9/11]] story is a ''theory'' about a ''conspiracy'', commercial media never describe it as a ''conspiracy theory''.
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
 
|WpURL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
 +
|WPCensored=No
 +
|WPTwisted=No
 +
|WPGaps=No
 +
|WPUnclear=Yes
 +
|Stub=No
 
|WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory
 
|WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory
 
|WsLink1Desc=While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.
 
|WsLink1Desc=While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.
Line 7: Line 14:
 
|WsLink2Desc=A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense
 
|WsLink2Desc=A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense
 
|WsLink3=The Power of Unreason
 
|WsLink3=The Power of Unreason
|WsLink3Desc=Crtique of an Establishment perspective on 'Conspiracy theories'
+
|WsLink3Desc=Critique of an Establishment paper on 'Conspiracy theories' sub-titled: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism
 +
|WsLink4=Document:Democratic State v Deep State
 +
|WsLink4Desc=A seminal paper by Norwegian academic [[Ola Tunander]]
 +
|WsLink5=Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory
 +
|WsLink5Desc=Another seminal paper by Lance DeHaven-Smith. Subtitled "Patterns of High Crime in American Government" and originally published in the February 2010 edition of '''''American Behavioral Scientist'''''
 +
|WsLink6=:Category:Conspiracy Theory
 +
|WsLink6Desc=A collection of pages, documents and articles filed under the category 'Conspiracy Theory'
 +
|ExLink1=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561
 +
|ExLink1Name=$100,000,000 to Crack A Lone Nut?
 +
|ExLink1Desc=A radio show including Mark Crispin Miller on the [[CIA]]'s creation of 'conspiracy theory' as a pejorative
 +
|ExLink2=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_theory
 +
|ExLink2Name=Conspiracy theory
 +
|ExLink2Desc=Conspiracy theory page on the [[Sourcewatch]] wiki
 +
|ExLink3=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/212
 +
|ExLink3Name=Conspiracy Reality (Understanding the Tools Used to Perpetuate Lies)
 +
|ExLink3Desc=Jamey Hecht on how the term "conspiracy theory" is used to deflect examination of the routine violence that the state uses to maintain power.
 +
|WpPageName=Conspiracy theory
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:04, 1 October 2013


Conspiracy theory Conspiracy theory
WpIcon32.png Conspiracy theory






Bias Obfuscation  The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and above all unclear. It fails to note that the phrase has been deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that commercially controlled media are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official 9/11 story is a theory about a conspiracy, commercial media never describe it as a conspiracy theory.


Related Wikispooks Pages

Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory - While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.
Document:Conspiracies and Conspiracism Document:Conspiracies and Conspiracism - A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense
The Power of Unreason The Power of Unreason - Critique of an Establishment paper on 'Conspiracy theories' sub-titled: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism
Document:Democratic State v Deep State Document:Democratic State v Deep State - A seminal paper by Norwegian academic Ola Tunander
Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory - Another seminal paper by Lance DeHaven-Smith. Subtitled "Patterns of High Crime in American Government" and originally published in the February 2010 edition of American Behavioral Scientist
:Category:Conspiracy Theory Category:Conspiracy Theory - A collection of pages, documents and articles filed under the category 'Conspiracy Theory'

External Links