Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited hangout"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added Talk template) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{talk}} | ||
{{HighTraffic|As of March 2015, this was Google's #5 hit on {{t|modified limited hangout}}}} | {{HighTraffic|As of March 2015, this was Google's #5 hit on {{t|modified limited hangout}}}} | ||
Revision as of 21:41, 16 August 2016
Include Concept(s) Or Part(s)?
I read this WikiSpooks Article identical to the Wikipedia article with additions, and the RationalWiki article. The RationalWiki had the following section I thought might be worthy for your consideration to re-edit and include:
- =Counter-examples=
- Conspiracy theorists in their paranoia tend to be over-sensitive to seeing "limited hangouts" where none exist. For example 9/11 and John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theorists are notoriously fractious, often accusing each other of being part of the cover-up by only revealing selective information.
- Selective reporting is a sort of flip side of a limited hangout, deliberate overreporting of minor events to make a political point or stir up moral panic.
~ JasonCarswell (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2016 (IST)