Difference between revisions of "Public Accounts Committee"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(image)
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|subgroups=National Audit Office (United Kingdom)
 
|subgroups=National Audit Office (United Kingdom)
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Accounts_Committee_(United_Kingdom)
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Accounts_Committee_(United_Kingdom)
|abbreviation=PAC
 
 
|image=Public Accounts Committee.jpg
 
|image=Public Accounts Committee.jpg
 
|leaders=Chair of the Public Accounts Committee
 
|leaders=Chair of the Public Accounts Committee
 
}}
 
}}
==Al-Yamamah arms deal‎==
+
==Findings==
{{FA|Al-Yamamah arms deal‎}}
+
===Al-Yamamah arms deal‎===
 
The 1992 report into the Al-Yamamah arms deal‎ was withheld from (some?) members of this committee.{{cn}} In October 1994, [[Tam Dalyell]] submitted documents to parliament that he claimed proved Mark Thatcher was also involved and received a £12 million commission on the deal‎  
 
The 1992 report into the Al-Yamamah arms deal‎ was withheld from (some?) members of this committee.{{cn}} In October 1994, [[Tam Dalyell]] submitted documents to parliament that he claimed proved Mark Thatcher was also involved and received a £12 million commission on the deal‎  
 
signed off by his mother while she was [[UK Prime Minister]]. The Public Accounts Committee decided not to investigate.<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/aug/08/saudiarabia.usa</ref>
 
signed off by his mother while she was [[UK Prime Minister]]. The Public Accounts Committee decided not to investigate.<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/aug/08/saudiarabia.usa</ref>
  
==Sellafield==
+
===Sellafield===
 
The Public Accounts Committee criticised the decommissioning of the [[Sellafield]] [[nuclear reprocessing]] site, noting the cost of decommissioning had now reached £67.5 billion, and there was "no indication of when that cost will stop rising".<ref name=bbc-20130204>{{cite news |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-21298117 |title=Sellafield clean-up cost reaches 67.5bn, says report |publisher=BBC |date=4 February 2013 |accessdate=19 February 2013}}</ref><ref name=reuters-20140211>{{cite news |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/uk-britain-nuclear-sellafield-idUKBREA1A00420140211 |title=UK lawmakers criticise management of Sellafield nuclear site |publisher=Reuters |date=11 February 2014 |accessdate=12 February 2014}}</ref>
 
The Public Accounts Committee criticised the decommissioning of the [[Sellafield]] [[nuclear reprocessing]] site, noting the cost of decommissioning had now reached £67.5 billion, and there was "no indication of when that cost will stop rising".<ref name=bbc-20130204>{{cite news |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-21298117 |title=Sellafield clean-up cost reaches 67.5bn, says report |publisher=BBC |date=4 February 2013 |accessdate=19 February 2013}}</ref><ref name=reuters-20140211>{{cite news |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/uk-britain-nuclear-sellafield-idUKBREA1A00420140211 |title=UK lawmakers criticise management of Sellafield nuclear site |publisher=Reuters |date=11 February 2014 |accessdate=12 February 2014}}</ref>
 +
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 18:07, 11 March 2023

Group.png Public Accounts Committee  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Public Accounts Committee.jpg
Parent organizationBritish House of Commons
LeaderChair of the Public Accounts Committee
Subgroups National Audit Office (United Kingdom)

Findings

Al-Yamamah arms deal‎

The 1992 report into the Al-Yamamah arms deal‎ was withheld from (some?) members of this committee.[citation needed] In October 1994, Tam Dalyell submitted documents to parliament that he claimed proved Mark Thatcher was also involved and received a £12 million commission on the deal‎ signed off by his mother while she was UK Prime Minister. The Public Accounts Committee decided not to investigate.[1]

Sellafield

The Public Accounts Committee criticised the decommissioning of the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site, noting the cost of decommissioning had now reached £67.5 billion, and there was "no indication of when that cost will stop rising".[2][3]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

  1. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/aug/08/saudiarabia.usa
  2. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  3. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}