Difference between revisions of "Pacifism"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism |constitutes= }} {{SMWDocs}} ==References== {{reflist}} {{Stub}}")
 
(unstub)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism
|constitutes=
+
|constitutes=philosophy
 +
|description=The belief in achieving a peaceful world through peaceful means.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
'''Pacifism''' is the belief in achieving a peaceful world through peaceful means.
 +
 +
== Definition ==
 +
{{SMWQ
 +
|text=My [[pacifism]] is an instinctive feeling, a feeling that possesses me because the [[murder]] of men is disgusting. My attitude is not derived from any intellectual theory but is based on my deepest antipathy to every kind of [[cruelty]] and [[hatred]].
 +
|authors=Albert Einstein
 +
|format=image
 +
|image=Albert Einstein on pacifism.jpg
 +
|image_width=400px
 +
|source_URL=https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/52424-my-pacifism-is-an-instinctive-feeling-a-feeling-that-possesses
 +
}}
 +
Pacifism covers a spectrum of views, including the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved, calls for the abolition of the institutions of the military and war, opposition to any organization of society through governmental force, rejection of the use of physical violence to obtain political, economic or social goals, the obliteration of force, and opposition to violence under any circumstance, even defence of self and others.
 +
 +
==Do what you can with what you have==
 +
One of community organizer [[Saul Alinsky]]'s theses is "You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments" <ref>Saul Alinsky ''Rules for Radicals'' 1972: 36-45</ref>. Alinsky uses the example of [[Mahatma Gandhi]]’s concept of ‘[[passive resistance]]’ as an illustration. He points out that perhaps ‘passive resistance’ was simply:
 +
 +
{{SMWQ
 +
|subjects=Mahatma Gandhi,passive resistance
 +
|text=the only intelligent, realistic, expedient program which Gandhi had at his disposal; and that the ‘morality’ which surrounded this policy of passive resistance was to a large degree a rationale to cloak a pragmatic program with a desired and essential moral cover…. Confronted with the issue of what means he could employ against the [[British Raj|British]], we come to the other criteria previously mentioned; that the kind of means selected and how they can be used is significantly dependent upon the face of the enemy, or the character of his opposition. Gandhi’s opposition not only made the effective use of passive resistance possible but practically invited it. His enemy was a British administration characterized by an old, aristocratic, [[liberal]] tradition, one which granted a good deal of [[freedom]] to its colonials and which always had operated on a pattern of using, absorbing, seducing, or destroying, through flattery or [[corruption]], the revolutionary leaders who arose from the colonial ranks. This was the kind of opposition that would have tolerated and ultimately capitulated before the tactic of passive resistance.
 +
|authors=Saul Alinsky
 +
|date=1972
 +
|source_URL=https://infed.org/mobi/saul-alinsky-community-organizing-and-rules-for-radicals/
 +
}}
 +
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
{{Stub}}
 

Latest revision as of 22:24, 24 January 2022

Concept.png Pacifism 
(philosophy)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Interest ofClifford Allen
The belief in achieving a peaceful world through peaceful means.

Pacifism is the belief in achieving a peaceful world through peaceful means.

Definition

Albert Einstein on pacifism.jpg

[1]

Pacifism covers a spectrum of views, including the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved, calls for the abolition of the institutions of the military and war, opposition to any organization of society through governmental force, rejection of the use of physical violence to obtain political, economic or social goals, the obliteration of force, and opposition to violence under any circumstance, even defence of self and others.

Do what you can with what you have

One of community organizer Saul Alinsky's theses is "You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments" [2]. Alinsky uses the example of Mahatma Gandhi’s concept of ‘passive resistance’ as an illustration. He points out that perhaps ‘passive resistance’ was simply:

“the only intelligent, realistic, expedient program which Gandhi had at his disposal; and that the ‘morality’ which surrounded this policy of passive resistance was to a large degree a rationale to cloak a pragmatic program with a desired and essential moral cover…. Confronted with the issue of what means he could employ against the British, we come to the other criteria previously mentioned; that the kind of means selected and how they can be used is significantly dependent upon the face of the enemy, or the character of his opposition. Gandhi’s opposition not only made the effective use of passive resistance possible but practically invited it. His enemy was a British administration characterized by an old, aristocratic, liberal tradition, one which granted a good deal of freedom to its colonials and which always had operated on a pattern of using, absorbing, seducing, or destroying, through flattery or corruption, the revolutionary leaders who arose from the colonial ranks. This was the kind of opposition that would have tolerated and ultimately capitulated before the tactic of passive resistance.”
Saul Alinsky (1972)  [3]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References