Difference between revisions of "9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Link fix)
(ON section title and some rewording)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{9/11 rules}}<br/>
 
{{9/11 rules}}<br/>
 
<div style="float:right;">{{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}</div>
 
<div style="float:right;">{{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}</div>
Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly seen as just that, an 'official explanation' rather than as the truth. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been questioned in parliaments from Japan<ref>http://www.projectcensored.org/24-japan-questions-9-11-and-the-global-war-on-terror/</ref> to Iran<ref>http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=17845</ref>. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or [[MSM|big media]].
+
==Official Narrative==
 +
Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly understood to be no more than a convenient cover story that has worn very thin. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been ednounced in the EU parliament and questioned in parliaments from Japan<ref>http://www.projectcensored.org/24-japan-questions-9-11-and-the-global-war-on-terror/</ref> to Iran<ref>http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=17845</ref>. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or by the {{ccm}}.
  
 
==Subsidiary 9/11 articles==
 
==Subsidiary 9/11 articles==

Revision as of 16:00, 26 November 2013

This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA. Template:9/11 rules

Official Narrative

Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly understood to be no more than a convenient cover story that has worn very thin. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been ednounced in the EU parliament and questioned in parliaments from Japan[1] to Iran[2]. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or by the commercially-controlled media.

Subsidiary 9/11 articles

Did you know that WTC7 collapsed spontaneously on 9/11, although it was not hit by a plane? Or that its collapse was announced on television before it happened?

See Also

References

External Links