Difference between revisions of "Template:Priority"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fix category)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
[[Category:Banner Template]]
+
[[Category:Banner Templates]]
This template is to be used for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul/upgrade plus additional information and references. Such pages are often newly created or copied from Wikipedia or elsewhere and in skeleton format only.</noinclude>
+
This template is for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul/upgrade plus additional information and references. Such pages are often newly created or copied from [[Wikipedia]] or elsewhere and in skeleton format only.</noinclude>
  
 
<div style="border:2px solid #ff0033; background-color:#faecc8; padding:0.4em 0.5em; margin:auto; width:86%; text-align:center;">
 
<div style="border:2px solid #ff0033; background-color:#faecc8; padding:0.4em 0.5em; margin:auto; width:86%; text-align:center;">
 
This page has unexplored connections to deep political events, people and organisations.  Please add to it. '''Especially''' with evidence that 'The official narrative' may be deceptive, misleading or false and which is either missing, minimised or claimed as refuted in corresponding Wikipedia entries.</div>
 
This page has unexplored connections to deep political events, people and organisations.  Please add to it. '''Especially''' with evidence that 'The official narrative' may be deceptive, misleading or false and which is either missing, minimised or claimed as refuted in corresponding Wikipedia entries.</div>

Revision as of 03:54, 24 October 2012

This template is for pages with unexplored links to deep politics generally and which require major overhaul/upgrade plus additional information and references. Such pages are often newly created or copied from Wikipedia or elsewhere and in skeleton format only.

This page has unexplored connections to deep political events, people and organisations. Please add to it. Especially with evidence that 'The official narrative' may be deceptive, misleading or false and which is either missing, minimised or claimed as refuted in corresponding Wikipedia entries.