Difference between revisions of "9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Update, add Corbett's (recommended) video remove {{stub}} since it has {{add}})
m (various edits)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| style="width:100%;" border="0"  
 
{| style="width:100%;" border="0"  
 
|+ align="top" |{{9/11 rules}}
 
|+ align="top" |{{9/11 rules}}
| {{Add}}
+
|}
 +
<div style="float:right;">{{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}</div>
 
A decade after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy.  This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such ''"catastrophic and catalyzing event"'', <ref>[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf PNAC Rebuilding America's Defences. Page 51]</ref> it surely cannot continue for much longer.  
 
A decade after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy.  This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such ''"catastrophic and catalyzing event"'', <ref>[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf PNAC Rebuilding America's Defences. Page 51]</ref> it surely cannot continue for much longer.  
| {{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}
 
|}
 
  
 
==Subsidiary 9/11 articles==
 
==Subsidiary 9/11 articles==

Revision as of 11:54, 12 April 2012

This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA.

Template:9/11 rules

A decade after the events, dissent from the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is framed, less as "conspiracy theory" and increasingly as legitimate mainstream controversy. This is because reasonable questions, arising from both glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report together with subsequent peer-reviewed scientific evidence, are routinely stone-walled as somehow 'unpatriotic' by the US authorities who simply refuse to address, let alone answer any of them. The tactic is wearing very thin indeed and, absent another such "catastrophic and catalyzing event", [1] it surely cannot continue for much longer.

Subsidiary 9/11 articles

Did you know that WTC7 collapsed spontaneously on 9/11, although it was not hit by a plane? Or that its collapse was announced on television before it happened?

See Also

References

External Links