Talk:Dominique Strauss-Kahn

This WS article also seems to have large parts from another online article copied, can this be checked.? -- Sunvalley (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

I agree that the DSK biography as it stands is lacking original content. This ICIJ article seems more succint and appropriate: https://projects.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/en/player/dominique-strauss-kahn

Should we delete one entirely and replace with the other?--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 22:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

With the article as it is .. I do not see what is what. However, the I-net article http://www.theoldie.co.uk/assets/docs/325_August.pdf seems to be gone, no archive that I can find .. so if the content of "Dominique Strauss-Kahn" right now is a copy from that article, it would be nice to have that move into it's own Document for save-keep. Otherwise, filling the WS entry/article with a wholesale copy+paste from some I-net article, especially when you can see that it is from an "opinion piece", that is not ideal. If the ICIJ is really better to use and copy+paste .. can' tell really, but there is this other angle on it -> [1] which I wanted to add as a document or partially in text, thus my visit here. - Sunvalley (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

The other angle looks promising, please add as suggested.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)