Difference between revisions of "User talk:Patrick Haseldine/Suppressed Lockerbie evidence ignited 9-11 attacks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Attempt to focus this looong page) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 11:29, 7 July 2015
Focus
Patrick, my first thought on this page is that it violates the first tenet of policy, since it appears to be a repetition of the (discredited) official narrative of 9-11. Since a lot of evidence exists that that narrative is a fiction designed to hide the truth, such a lengthy repetition would seem at cross purposes with our efforts to expose the truth. So:
- What evidence do you have for your belief that the BBC story was a "prearranged signal for the hijackers to proceed with the 9/11 attacks"?
- Is your answer to the above clarified by inclusion of the timeline, or would it be better as a stand alone?