Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vela Incident"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added Talk template)
(Thanks Robin)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==Undoing the Wikipedia import==
 
==Undoing the Wikipedia import==
 
First let me say that I ''do'' appreciate your enthusiasm in seeking to contribute to this article, [[User:‎Patrick Haseldine|‎Patrick]]. I don't doubt that that last import did contain worthwhile material. Nevertheless, I have undone it, in accordance with the policy on [[Project:Importing From Wikipedia|Importing From Wikipedia]], since I suspect that it also had some suspect material (disinfo). The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident whole Wikipedia page is readily available] anyway, so just repeating it does a disservice to the reader, rather than a carefully selected sub-set that correlates with the [[deep politics]]' focus of Wikispooks. I came to this event via the [[South Africa/Nuclear weapons]] page, so some careful study of that material (perhaps a sub-page about their clandestine sell-off) might be a worthy exercise before developing this page. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 00:46, 13 March 2016 (GMT)
 
First let me say that I ''do'' appreciate your enthusiasm in seeking to contribute to this article, [[User:‎Patrick Haseldine|‎Patrick]]. I don't doubt that that last import did contain worthwhile material. Nevertheless, I have undone it, in accordance with the policy on [[Project:Importing From Wikipedia|Importing From Wikipedia]], since I suspect that it also had some suspect material (disinfo). The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident whole Wikipedia page is readily available] anyway, so just repeating it does a disservice to the reader, rather than a carefully selected sub-set that correlates with the [[deep politics]]' focus of Wikispooks. I came to this event via the [[South Africa/Nuclear weapons]] page, so some careful study of that material (perhaps a sub-page about their clandestine sell-off) might be a worthy exercise before developing this page. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 00:46, 13 March 2016 (GMT)
 +
 +
:Thanks [[User:Robin|Robin]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident The Wikipedia page] has certainly been heavily censored [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vela_Incident&oldid=227809081 since July 2008 when I added] [http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB190/03.pdf this CIA document dated 21 January 1980 – Confidential memorandum from Bruce C Clarke (Deputy Director for National Foreign Assessment) to Ralph Earle II (Director, US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency)]. My old sparring partner [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Socrates2008 Socrates2008] did much of the censoring, I see.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 14:43, 13 March 2016 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 14:43, 13 March 2016

Undoing the Wikipedia import

First let me say that I do appreciate your enthusiasm in seeking to contribute to this article, ‎Patrick. I don't doubt that that last import did contain worthwhile material. Nevertheless, I have undone it, in accordance with the policy on Importing From Wikipedia, since I suspect that it also had some suspect material (disinfo). The whole Wikipedia page is readily available anyway, so just repeating it does a disservice to the reader, rather than a carefully selected sub-set that correlates with the deep politics' focus of Wikispooks. I came to this event via the South Africa/Nuclear weapons page, so some careful study of that material (perhaps a sub-page about their clandestine sell-off) might be a worthy exercise before developing this page. -- Robin (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2016 (GMT)

Thanks Robin. The Wikipedia page has certainly been heavily censored since July 2008 when I added this CIA document dated 21 January 1980 – Confidential memorandum from Bruce C Clarke (Deputy Director for National Foreign Assessment) to Ralph Earle II (Director, US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency). My old sparring partner Socrates2008 did much of the censoring, I see.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2016 (GMT)