Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Ecologist"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added Talk template)
(2 points..)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:[[Oliver Tickell]]'s seminal article is, I think, worth quoting in its entirety, given the attempted coup against [[Jeremy Corbyn]] and the current turmoil in the [[Labour Party]].--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 16:14, 25 August 2016 (IST)
 
:[[Oliver Tickell]]'s seminal article is, I think, worth quoting in its entirety, given the attempted coup against [[Jeremy Corbyn]] and the current turmoil in the [[Labour Party]].--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 16:14, 25 August 2016 (IST)
 +
 +
::If you check the [https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=The_Ecologist&action=history page history], you will see that I edited the article, unaware that it in fact quoted from elsewhere. I hope that this highlights the need for correct attribution of 3rd party input. I have two questions at this stage:
 +
::# Does any more of this article belongs inside quotes of some sort?
 +
::# Since you express a desire to include that article in full, ''which page'' do you think would be the best place to do this? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (IST)

Revision as of 15:45, 25 August 2016

Uncertain origin tag

UnsourcedDocs.png I started work on this article but then noticed that some of it is verbatim from here. How much more is created by a non-Wikispooks source, I wonder?... Robin (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2016 (IST)

Oliver Tickell's seminal article is, I think, worth quoting in its entirety, given the attempted coup against Jeremy Corbyn and the current turmoil in the Labour Party.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2016 (IST)
If you check the page history, you will see that I edited the article, unaware that it in fact quoted from elsewhere. I hope that this highlights the need for correct attribution of 3rd party input. I have two questions at this stage:
  1. Does any more of this article belongs inside quotes of some sort?
  2. Since you express a desire to include that article in full, which page do you think would be the best place to do this? -- Robin (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (IST)