Talk:Free energy

Sorry

Sorry to say, that "This theory is opposed by mainstream science" is correct and in this regard I am a mainstream scientist. What about logic: If it were possible to abandon the law of energy preservation, could you imagine the consequences? To say it constitutes "Renewable energy", however, or "Suppressed technology" is extreme, so please let me change that to reflect the very hypothetical nature of a theory completely overtrowing the core foundation of physics as we know it. -- Urban (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Argument back and forth does not make sense, it comes down to if you can believe that such thing like the m. motor can work or not. The article is still fair I would say, if you want to remove the terms in "constitutes", please go ahead. -- Sunvalley (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)