Difference between revisions of "Nuclear waste"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Stub) |
(Stub) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Finland== | ==Finland== | ||
| − | The citizens of [[Finland]] voted to dispose of all their country's nuclear waster within the borders of Finland, not to export the problems elsewhere. As of 2010, only Finland had begun construction of a ''permanent'' storage facility for disposal of nuclear waste; other countries had only ''temporary'' storage. | + | The citizens of [[Finland]] voted to dispose of all their country's nuclear waster within the borders of Finland, not to export the problems elsewhere. As of 2010, only Finland had begun construction of a ''permanent'' storage facility for disposal of nuclear waste; other countries had only ''temporary'' storage.<ref>http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/558</ref> |
==Fracking== | ==Fracking== | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 21 September 2015
 Nuclear waste  | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Dale E. Klein |
| A byproduct which advocates of the nuclear power industry generally avoid dealing with. Some waste will remain toxic for hundreds of thousands of years. | |
Finland
The citizens of Finland voted to dispose of all their country's nuclear waster within the borders of Finland, not to export the problems elsewhere. As of 2010, only Finland had begun construction of a permanent storage facility for disposal of nuclear waste; other countries had only temporary storage.[1]
Fracking
As early as 1964, Halliburton were researching a combined hydraulic fracturing/nuclear waste disposal technique.[2]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
