Difference between revisions of "Document talk:Chemtrails - Proof and Purpose"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Editing this and ANY document: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Can we correct the statement in the article? Or do we just note that it is false here in Discussion, and provide the correct information. How about highlighting the bunk in the article, and providing correct information in a series of footnotes? | :Can we correct the statement in the article? Or do we just note that it is false here in Discussion, and provide the correct information. How about highlighting the bunk in the article, and providing correct information in a series of footnotes? | ||
:Actually, the introduction (yellow box at the top) is not even a correct statement about the article - "climate engineering" is not mentioned in the article at all! --[[User:Yuri Zephyros|Yuri Zephyros]] ([[User talk:Yuri Zephyros|talk]]) 03:50, 17 August 2014 (IST) | :Actually, the introduction (yellow box at the top) is not even a correct statement about the article - "climate engineering" is not mentioned in the article at all! --[[User:Yuri Zephyros|Yuri Zephyros]] ([[User talk:Yuri Zephyros|talk]]) 03:50, 17 August 2014 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Editing this and ANY document == | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[WikiSpooks:Document Editing Rules|Document Editing Rules]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | No editing of the actual article other than to provide internal links and improve formatting. Use the 'Edit with form' option to edit explanatory information about the article. Issues the alleged accuracy of the information in the article (beyond the briefest of overall mentions in the "Wikispooks comment" section of the form) must be confined to the article discussion page. You could also propose it for deletion as rubbish and/or author a page or debunking article with links --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 06:51, 17 August 2014 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 05:51, 17 August 2014
Contents
Erratum
"Barium is a piezoelectric substance"
- No, barium is a reactive metal. Possibly the author is thinking about barium titanate.
In the first paragraph
- "As the operations intensified, NASA, aviation authorities, and military organisations responded to queries made by concerned citizens that the trails in question were merely condensation trails (contrails) generated by jets, which, they claimed, have always persisted and expanded in all temperatures, humidity levels, and altitudes." Can the author be contacted to provide a reference to his source for this statement? Compare that false statement with, for instance, the FAA/EPA/NASA Fact Sheet about condensation trails: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/envir_policy/media/contrails.pdf
- Can we correct the statement in the article? Or do we just note that it is false here in Discussion, and provide the correct information. How about highlighting the bunk in the article, and providing correct information in a series of footnotes?
- Actually, the introduction (yellow box at the top) is not even a correct statement about the article - "climate engineering" is not mentioned in the article at all! --Yuri Zephyros (talk) 03:50, 17 August 2014 (IST)
Editing this and ANY document
No editing of the actual article other than to provide internal links and improve formatting. Use the 'Edit with form' option to edit explanatory information about the article. Issues the alleged accuracy of the information in the article (beyond the briefest of overall mentions in the "Wikispooks comment" section of the form) must be confined to the article discussion page. You could also propose it for deletion as rubbish and/or author a page or debunking article with links --Peter P (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2014 (IST)
