Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Semantic Objects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (t) |
(Descriptions, descriptions, descriptions) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hindsight and thus a tad more thought. | :Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hindsight and thus a tad more thought. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The comparison with the category tree is a good one. I take occasional swipes at that, trim off a branch here and there when it has been replaced by SMW markup. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
:I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | :I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I reckon descriptions are the biggest shortfall at the moment. Well, also some important pages to connect the documents, but that cache is where most of the information is, a good wodge of source material. If you've read the document then making a good description can be very easy, so I recommend you work on that - synopses also good as and when, but I suggest descriptions first, now that there are all those empty boxes in the SMWDocs tables. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 7 January 2014
Other Possible Objects
- Nation (Possible have as a sub-object of Group)
- Places
- Ideology
- Company (Possible have as a sub-object of Group)
Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.
- Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hindsight and thus a tad more thought.
- I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --Peter P (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT)
- I reckon descriptions are the biggest shortfall at the moment. Well, also some important pages to connect the documents, but that cache is where most of the information is, a good wodge of source material. If you've read the document then making a good description can be very easy, so I recommend you work on that - synopses also good as and when, but I suggest descriptions first, now that there are all those empty boxes in the SMWDocs tables. Robin (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (GMT)
