Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pizzagate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Research) |
(question update) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:This is the name that was settled on right from the beginning, when pictures of Alefantis Instagram and some of his "friends" were getting attention + Stratfor e-mails and other stuff. Better stay with it. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 16:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | :This is the name that was settled on right from the beginning, when pictures of Alefantis Instagram and some of his "friends" were getting attention + Stratfor e-mails and other stuff. Better stay with it. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 16:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
::[[Andrew Breitbart]]: "How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer...", that was about something different I think, some sort of policy issue, can not be tied to pizzagate, which you can check on if you look at the tweets he send before or shortly after. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 16:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ::[[Andrew Breitbart]]: "How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer...", that was about something different I think, some sort of policy issue, can not be tied to pizzagate, which you can check on if you look at the tweets he send before or shortly after. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 16:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
::Can't find the where that quote is, yet. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 21:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ::Can't find the where that quote is, yet. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 21:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::He said that on his twitter, but that was about something in connection with Planned Parenthood, if you just mention the quote like this (no background), it gives the wrong impression. Now I see I left archives of some relevant tweets in the comments at Andrew Breitbart talk page. But I would have to look into the circumstances, to understand what exactly the issue was back then. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 19:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
===Research=== | ===Research=== | ||
https://isgp-studies.com/pizzagate | https://isgp-studies.com/pizzagate | ||
This is recommended. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 21:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) | This is recommended. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 21:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:47, 17 December 2021
What about a less trivial title for this article, and redirect Pizzagate to it, or is the name too worked in? I always thought the name Pizzagate was an attempt to make something serious into something harmless with a silly name. Terje (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)---
- This is the name that was settled on right from the beginning, when pictures of Alefantis Instagram and some of his "friends" were getting attention + Stratfor e-mails and other stuff. Better stay with it. -- Sunvalley (talk) 16:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Andrew Breitbart: "How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer...", that was about something different I think, some sort of policy issue, can not be tied to pizzagate, which you can check on if you look at the tweets he send before or shortly after. -- Sunvalley (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- He said that on his twitter, but that was about something in connection with Planned Parenthood, if you just mention the quote like this (no background), it gives the wrong impression. Now I see I left archives of some relevant tweets in the comments at Andrew Breitbart talk page. But I would have to look into the circumstances, to understand what exactly the issue was back then. -- Sunvalley (talk) 19:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Research
https://isgp-studies.com/pizzagate This is recommended. --Jun (talk) 21:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)