Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free energy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Sorry to say, that "This theory is opposed by mainstream science" is correct) |
m (please let me change that) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Sorry== | ==Sorry== | ||
| − | Sorry to say, that "This theory is opposed by mainstream science" is correct and in this regard I am a mainstream scientist. What about logic: If it were possible to abandon the law of energy preservation, could you imagine the consequences? -- [[User:Urban|Urban]] ([[User talk:Urban|talk]]) 07:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC) | + | Sorry to say, that "This theory is opposed by mainstream science" is correct and in this regard I am a mainstream scientist. What about logic: If it were possible to abandon the law of energy preservation, could you imagine the consequences? |
| + | To say it constitutes "Renewable energy", however, or "Suppressed technology" is extreme, so please let me change that to reflect the very hypothetical nature of a theory completely overtrowing the core foundation of physics as we know it. -- [[User:Urban|Urban]] ([[User talk:Urban|talk]]) 07:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:39, 24 September 2021
Sorry
Sorry to say, that "This theory is opposed by mainstream science" is correct and in this regard I am a mainstream scientist. What about logic: If it were possible to abandon the law of energy preservation, could you imagine the consequences? To say it constitutes "Renewable energy", however, or "Suppressed technology" is extreme, so please let me change that to reflect the very hypothetical nature of a theory completely overtrowing the core foundation of physics as we know it. -- Urban (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
