Difference between revisions of "Property talk:Has documentType"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Rename suggestion)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Rename Suggestion==
 
==Rename Suggestion==
I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type".
+
I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type". [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:48, 28 November 2013 (GMT)

Revision as of 03:48, 28 November 2013

Rename Suggestion

I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type". Robin (talk) 03:48, 28 November 2013 (GMT)