Difference between revisions of "Property talk:Has documentType"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Rename suggestion) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Rename Suggestion== | ==Rename Suggestion== | ||
− | I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type". | + | I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type". [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:48, 28 November 2013 (GMT) |
Revision as of 03:48, 28 November 2013
Rename Suggestion
I wonder whether this wouldn't be better as the more general "has type". This fits the "few terms, many uses" approach - seems like less work, and I'm also thinking of the RDF's use by semantic reasoning engines, which should probably have sort of equivalent of "has type". Robin (talk) 03:48, 28 November 2013 (GMT)