Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patrick Haseldine"
(→Length: new section) |
(Protecting WS from the legal beagles!) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Length == | == Length == | ||
| − | I've just done some minor trimming, but I'm concerned that the article is rather long. Perhaps we could think about how to split it up into subsidiary articles, main topics, [[Patrick Haseldine's | + | I've just done some minor trimming, but I'm concerned that the article is rather long. Perhaps we could think about how to split it up into subsidiary articles, main topics, [[Patrick Haseldine's Criticism of Thatcher]] etc. Following the wikipedia style, these could have a summary treatment in the page itself, preceded by "''Main article: [[Patrick Haseldine's Interest in The Lockerbie Bombing]]''" to point readers to the more specialised page on just that topic. [[User:Robin|Robin]] 04:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ==Critique by [[John Ashton]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm all for constructive criticism by WS editors and will respond to [[John Ashton]] in due course. However, I've had to excise the "actionable material" part of [[John Ashton|John's]] critique to protect WS from the legal beagles! --[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] 14:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 26 March 2013
My WikiSpooks Biography
I propose to make a number of amendments to my WikiSpooks biography, and to include some missing references. Am I allowed to edit my own biography? Patrick Haseldine 11:39, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem with that Patrick. Wikipedia has some serious blind-spots and biases which this site seeks to redress. There's bags of stuff about it in the project pages - especially The problem with Wikipedia. --Peter P 12:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Length
I've just done some minor trimming, but I'm concerned that the article is rather long. Perhaps we could think about how to split it up into subsidiary articles, main topics, Patrick Haseldine's Criticism of Thatcher etc. Following the wikipedia style, these could have a summary treatment in the page itself, preceded by "Main article: Patrick Haseldine's Interest in The Lockerbie Bombing" to point readers to the more specialised page on just that topic. Robin 04:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Critique by John Ashton
I'm all for constructive criticism by WS editors and will respond to John Ashton in due course. However, I've had to excise the "actionable material" part of John's critique to protect WS from the legal beagles! --Patrick Haseldine 14:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
