Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chris"
m (Text replacement - "[[Wikispooks:" to "[[Project:") |
m (Text replacement - "WikiSpooks" to "Wikispooks") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<big>We're glad you came.</big><br/> | <big>We're glad you came.</big><br/> | ||
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br/> | You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br/> | ||
| − | The page at [[ | + | The page at [[Wikispooks:Getting Started]] should help you get started. [[User:Peter|Peter P]] 21:49, 1 September 2012 (IST) |
Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST) | Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 14 October 2018
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came.
You will probably want to read the help pages.
The page at Wikispooks:Getting Started should help you get started. Peter P 21:49, 1 September 2012 (IST)
Judging by your contributions to date (5 single para articles in 24 hours!), your understanding of what Wikispooks is about falls short of what is required. Sorry to be so blunt but that's the way it appears. The site is not a suitable home for sensational, unreferenced assertions stated as fact. I have deleted all of them and converted a couple to stub pages since their titles are suitable WS subjects. I suggest you spend some time studying the project pages before making further contributions. --Peter P 07:18, 2 September 2012 (IST)
Thanks for your advice Peter. Sorry to hear you value Life and Truth so cheaply. Since when was the CIA Research at Stanford unreferenced! You have shown your true colors, better Luck next incarnation? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG6LC_5hDXQ
Article guidlines
There is no place on this site for single paragraph - or single sentence - articles that are uncategorised and simply reference external sites with little or no explanation. Please read the WS project pages to get a good overview of what the site IS about and the guidelines on article/document composition etc. --Peter P 16:36, 2 September 2012 (IST)
You might want to checkout the Secret Government´s use of Apache Gunships for school runs in the UK? Clearly a Sign they are O.O.I. or J.T.S.? Killing women or old men has always been their Signature. They might needs to pack something heavier for Live Game. TTFN. PS. Which Oxbridge College were you at? I´d guess Cambridge.
