Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Ecologist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(2 points..) |
(→Uncertain origin tag: IMHO this page is without doubt the best place for it!) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::# Does any more of this article belongs inside quotes of some sort? | ::# Does any more of this article belongs inside quotes of some sort? | ||
::# Since you express a desire to include that article in full, ''which page'' do you think would be the best place to do this? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (IST) | ::# Since you express a desire to include that article in full, ''which page'' do you think would be the best place to do this? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::The "3rd party input", [[User:Robin|Robin]], is [[Oliver Tickell]]'s - the editor of ''[[The Ecologist]]'' - and IMHO this page is without doubt the best place for it!--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 21:27, 25 August 2016 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 20:27, 25 August 2016
Uncertain origin tag
 |
I started work on this article but then noticed that some of it is verbatim from here. How much more is created by a non-Wikispooks source, I wonder?... Robin (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2016 (IST) |
- Oliver Tickell's seminal article is, I think, worth quoting in its entirety, given the attempted coup against Jeremy Corbyn and the current turmoil in the Labour Party.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2016 (IST)
- If you check the page history, you will see that I edited the article, unaware that it in fact quoted from elsewhere. I hope that this highlights the need for correct attribution of 3rd party input. I have two questions at this stage:
- The "3rd party input", Robin, is Oliver Tickell's - the editor of The Ecologist - and IMHO this page is without doubt the best place for it!--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2016 (IST)
