Difference between revisions of "Dutch prelim report issued"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (add) |
m (Text replacement - "{{MH17 timeline event " to "{{Event |timelines=Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 ") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Event |
+ | |timelines=Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 | ||
|start=2014/09/09 12:00:00 AM | |start=2014/09/09 12:00:00 AM | ||
|description=The Dutch Safety Board preliminary report into the MH17 disaster published. It rules out crew/passenger actions or technical failure as the cause but says nothing else of substance that was not already known. | |description=The Dutch Safety Board preliminary report into the MH17 disaster published. It rules out crew/passenger actions or technical failure as the cause but says nothing else of substance that was not already known. |
Latest revision as of 16:04, 3 July 2015
Further information
- Full report:File:MH17 preliminary report.pdf
The report does not apportion blame and publishes little that can easily be harnessed to the "Putin did it" meme'.
The physical evidence it describes is in fact more consistent with a fighter attack firing cannon from the port-side rear of the airliner since the cockpit area damage it describes and illustrates with images is also consistent with damage which - tellingly - it neither describes nor posts images of, but which is readily available to view online - see image right.
It is noteworthy that pressure and appeals to publish further information known to be in the Inquiry's possession comes only from Russia. [1]
References
- ↑ Russia's UN Envoy Churkin: Dutch Report on MH17 Crash Investigation Inadequate - RIA Novosti 10 September 2014