Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daily Mail"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(question) |
m (Rankinfg) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I wonder if the Wikipedia judgement of the ''Daily Mail'' should so plainly apply here (?). They often went against the tide, publishing contrarian (more real) view imo, and thus have angered the establishment. A change in wording might be good. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 18:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | + | I wonder if the Wikipedia judgement of the ''Daily Mail'' should so plainly apply here (?). They often went against the tide, publishing contrarian (more real) view imo, and thus have angered the establishment. A change in wording might be good. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 18:16, 18 |
| + | September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | :The dozens of lawsuits would beg to differ. Like their stories? Just post the contrarian views then. [[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 00:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
