Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks talk:Semantic Objects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(suggestions) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
''Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.'' | ''Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hidsight and thus a tad more thought. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 07:19, 7 January 2014
Other Possible Objects
- Nation (Possible have as a sub-object of Group)
- Places
- Ideology
- Company (Possible have as a sub-object of Group)
Exactly how to define sub-objects is an open question as yet.
- Agreed your last sentence :-)). I guess there's little option but to grow the 'property tree' like categories - but with the benefit of hidsight and thus a tad more thought.
- I also agree that list with people and events at the top of the priority order. Need to be clear about books too. We currently have maybe 100 full books (Category:EBooks) plus assorted book reviews, extracts and synopses. We probably need 'Sysnopsis' as another sub-property of 'Document' too. Re latest email exchange with Joel van der Reijden, I can see me doing lots of those. --Peter P (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2014 (GMT)
