Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Description"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(style...) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Style== | ==Style== | ||
I'm not sure whether I like this or not. It's quite a departure from the normal WS style, which makes it eye catching -- maybe good if the description is worthy of the extra attention. I feel like there's room for improvement. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:41, 3 January 2014 (GMT) | I'm not sure whether I like this or not. It's quite a departure from the normal WS style, which makes it eye catching -- maybe good if the description is worthy of the extra attention. I feel like there's room for improvement. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:41, 3 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Same here. As a general rule I prefer left justification for article content, banners, headings and sub heading - consistency. I think a banner type box is OK for 'description' but am not so sure about colour, and both box and text centred. I'll have a play too. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:44, 3 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 3 January 2014
Style
I'm not sure whether I like this or not. It's quite a departure from the normal WS style, which makes it eye catching -- maybe good if the description is worthy of the extra attention. I feel like there's room for improvement. Robin (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2014 (GMT)
- Same here. As a general rule I prefer left justification for article content, banners, headings and sub heading - consistency. I think a banner type box is OK for 'description' but am not so sure about colour, and both box and text centred. I'll have a play too. --Peter P (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2014 (GMT)
