Difference between revisions of "Template talk:KnownParticipants"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
With the proviso that it should be included in [[Template:SMWDocs]], rather than added by hand, yes, that should be too tricky. By an SMW quirk, UnknownParticipants is harder, so the simple: "Unknown Participants", "Known Participants", structure is not yet available. This being the case, when should 'KnownX' be deployed as an extra section ahead of 'AllX'? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC) | With the proviso that it should be included in [[Template:SMWDocs]], rather than added by hand, yes, that should be too tricky. By an SMW quirk, UnknownParticipants is harder, so the simple: "Unknown Participants", "Known Participants", structure is not yet available. This being the case, when should 'KnownX' be deployed as an extra section ahead of 'AllX'? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I believe it is more to the point if known participants, 'KnownX', are first, since they have a Wikispooks article. AllX is just a large heap of unfamiliar names. | ||
| + | [[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 22:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 27 December 2022
This one is clever, could you add one the same template for groups as well? Terje (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
With the proviso that it should be included in Template:SMWDocs, rather than added by hand, yes, that should be too tricky. By an SMW quirk, UnknownParticipants is harder, so the simple: "Unknown Participants", "Known Participants", structure is not yet available. This being the case, when should 'KnownX' be deployed as an extra section ahead of 'AllX'? -- Robin (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- I believe it is more to the point if known participants, 'KnownX', are first, since they have a Wikispooks article. AllX is just a large heap of unfamiliar names.
