Difference between revisions of "Property talk:Was assassinated on"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new semantics) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:41, 20 December 2013 (GMT) | [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:41, 20 December 2013 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I go along with all that. Same goes for "Is author", "Was murdered". I'm still feeling my way with these a bit. Also best to learn to be rigorous about these things at the outset before rolling out more properties. Make what alterations you see fit and I'll have a good look at changes and discuss if I see issues - real or imagined. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 16:55, 20 December 2013 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 20 December 2013
New Semantics?
RDF has triples, so for example(JFK "Was assassinated") isn't valid RDF. (JFK "Was assassinated" JFK) is, but is redundant.
Was assassinated on
One option would be to replace it with "was assassinated on" and have (JFK "Was assassinated on" date).
Was assassinated by
One option would be to replace it with "was assassinated by" and have (JFK "Was assassinated by" "someone").
"assassinated"
Simpler still, (and equivalent to the above) would be just to use "assassinated". i.e. (CIA "assassinated" JFK).
Robin (talk) 14:41, 20 December 2013 (GMT)
- I go along with all that. Same goes for "Is author", "Was murdered". I'm still feeling my way with these a bit. Also best to learn to be rigorous about these things at the outset before rolling out more properties. Make what alterations you see fit and I'll have a good look at changes and discuss if I see issues - real or imagined. --Peter P (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2013 (GMT)
