Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Document"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (reply)
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 09:08, 11 November 2013 (GMT)
 
[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 09:08, 11 November 2013 (GMT)
  
;;I'm impressed!!. There must be a way to use SMW parsing for precisely that purpose and the 'isdate' property is the logical one to do it since it simply identifies any old format as a semantically readable date. I do think it would be better to have a new property [[property:Publication date]] for the documents publication date field though. I'll create it anyway and it can be used if you agree. SMW has a LOT of potential methinks --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 09:15, 11 November 2013 (GMT)
+
:I'm impressed!!. There must be a way to use SMW parsing for precisely that purpose and the 'isdate' property is the logical one to do it since it simply identifies any old format as a semantically readable date. I do think it would be better to have a new property [[property:Publication date]] for the documents publication date field though. I'll create it anyway and it can be used if you agree. SMW has a LOT of potential methinks --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 09:15, 11 November 2013 (GMT)

Revision as of 09:16, 11 November 2013

Mandatory

Would it be a good idea to use this on all items in the document: namespace?

Robin (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2013 (GMT)

Yep. I think it would. Not sure how to force it though, bearing in mind there a lot of documents that pre-exist the template and don't currently incorporate it. A form for the template would be very useful though --Peter P (talk) 08:34, 29 October 2013 (GMT)

Processing Semantic Dates

Semantic wiki does seem to be able to parse dates for its own purposes. Is there a way to use it to convert a randomly formatted date into an ISO-formatted date, so this can be used, e.g. to assign a document to a "YYYY Publications" category?

Robin (talk) 09:08, 11 November 2013 (GMT)

I'm impressed!!. There must be a way to use SMW parsing for precisely that purpose and the 'isdate' property is the logical one to do it since it simply identifies any old format as a semantically readable date. I do think it would be better to have a new property property:Publication date for the documents publication date field though. I'll create it anyway and it can be used if you agree. SMW has a LOT of potential methinks --Peter P (talk) 09:15, 11 November 2013 (GMT)