Difference between revisions of "Talk:Robert Black"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(What's the point of splitting it up?)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{talk}}
 
==How about a subpage [[Robert Black/Lockerbie involvement]]?==
 
==How about a subpage [[Robert Black/Lockerbie involvement]]?==
 
Such a subpage, [[User:Robin|Robin]], would contain at least 95% of the current page: i.e. what's the point of splitting it up? I therefore '''disagree'''!--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 23:24, 7 August 2016 (IST)
 
Such a subpage, [[User:Robin|Robin]], would contain at least 95% of the current page: i.e. what's the point of splitting it up? I therefore '''disagree'''!--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 23:24, 7 August 2016 (IST)
 +
 +
:That's a fair point, Patrick. You are responsible for most of the page, so perhaps you can think of a better way to reduce its excessive size? --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 08:55, 8 August 2016 (IST)
 +
 +
::I made a start yesterday to sort it out. Remedial work is ongoing.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 15:30, 9 August 2016 (IST)

Latest revision as of 14:30, 9 August 2016

How about a subpage Robert Black/Lockerbie involvement?

Such a subpage, Robin, would contain at least 95% of the current page: i.e. what's the point of splitting it up? I therefore disagree!--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2016 (IST)

That's a fair point, Patrick. You are responsible for most of the page, so perhaps you can think of a better way to reduce its excessive size? --Robin (talk) 08:55, 8 August 2016 (IST)
I made a start yesterday to sort it out. Remedial work is ongoing.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 15:30, 9 August 2016 (IST)