Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rupert Sheldrake/Video"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "How about having the contents of this page as a part of Template:SMWDocs of the parent page? -- ~~~~") |
m (reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
How about having the contents of this page as a part of [[Template:SMWDocs]] of the parent page? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 13:36, 10 August 2015 (IST) | How about having the contents of this page as a part of [[Template:SMWDocs]] of the parent page? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 13:36, 10 August 2015 (IST) | ||
| + | :Oops I deleted the page before spotting this talk item. On reflection, it seemed to me that to manually mix subject-based subpages with type-based ones would lead to an even worse mess on the videos issue than at present, so I deleted it. I suggest we re-hash the MainPageVideo complex of templates, forms and pages to better fit video into the existing SMWDocs structures. It may be best to create a separate page for each streamed video instance and put selected ones in the text of appropriate pages using a catch-all template calling the video page rather than the present YoutubeVideo one. There's legacy stuff to deal with (description2 and publication date - ie date appeared on main page - are two obvious ones). However I doubt there's much of use defined by either of those params so. I do agree that the indexing and display of videos should be tightly integrated with the evolving SMWDocs stucture --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 13:58, 10 August 2015 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:59, 10 August 2015
How about having the contents of this page as a part of Template:SMWDocs of the parent page? -- Robin (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2015 (IST)
- Oops I deleted the page before spotting this talk item. On reflection, it seemed to me that to manually mix subject-based subpages with type-based ones would lead to an even worse mess on the videos issue than at present, so I deleted it. I suggest we re-hash the MainPageVideo complex of templates, forms and pages to better fit video into the existing SMWDocs structures. It may be best to create a separate page for each streamed video instance and put selected ones in the text of appropriate pages using a catch-all template calling the video page rather than the present YoutubeVideo one. There's legacy stuff to deal with (description2 and publication date - ie date appeared on main page - are two obvious ones). However I doubt there's much of use defined by either of those params so. I do agree that the indexing and display of videos should be tightly integrated with the evolving SMWDocs stucture --Peter P (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2015 (IST)
